# Tangency Condition for FEM

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 24, 1999, 00:10 Tangency Condition for FEM #1 Hiro Nishikawa Guest   Posts: n/a Incompressible potential flows in 2D are governed by two Laplace equations for velocities. I discretize these equations by FEM on triangular grids, and solve the resulting linear system by Gauss-Seidel iteration, for a flow around a Karman-Trefftz airfoil with the exact solution on the outer boundary, but a tangency condition on the airfoil surface. The tangency condition: I simply ignore the normal component of the velocity at the boundary nodes produced by Gasss-Seidel iterations. (i.e. update the velocity at a boundary node, subtract the normal component, go update to the next boundary node.) QUESTIONS: (1)Are there any other ways to impose tangency on the airfoil? (2)How fine the grid should be to obtain a good solution (say, 1% pointwise error ON the airfoil), especially for a lifting problem? According to my results, FEM is very inefficient for lifting problems as it requies extremely fine grids (more than 1000 nodes on the boundaries) to get such good solutions while such solutions are more cheaply obtained by panel methods. Do you think that there is a bug in my code? Thank you for reading my message, Hiro

 July 26, 1999, 09:00 Re: Tangency Condition for FEM #2 Farid Moussaoui Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, You can apply the tangency condition simply by changing velocity unknows (u,v) by (u_n,u_s) on the airfoil, where u_n is the normal velocity and u_s the tangential component. I have not the references in mind but you can see my paper on http://www.math.u-psud.fr/~moussaou/Papers/unify.ps.gz Farid++

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post CFD XUE FLUENT 0 July 8, 2010 06:49 bearcharge Main CFD Forum 0 May 14, 2010 11:32 Frank Main CFD Forum 1 April 21, 2008 18:36 normunds OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 June 4, 2007 06:45 Matt Umbel Main CFD Forum 0 January 11, 2002 11:06

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:33.