CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

CFD for turbomachinery

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 26, 1999, 12:52
Default CFD for turbomachinery
  #1
Quentin Roberts
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We are looking at CFD packages for analysing radial turbomachines, turbine and compressor (i.e. rotor + radial stator vanes + volute/housing), so we need a code that can mesh blade rows and 3D housings as quickly as possible, as well as having robust solver methodologies. TASCflow, FINE/Turbo and FLUENT are in the running - are there any other codes that we should be giving serious consideration to?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 1999, 13:39
Default Re: CFD for turbomachinery
  #2
John C. Chien
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
(1). The radial turbomachinery is quite different from the axial turbomachinery. The complete geometry is highly complex, and the 3-D flow field always has flow separation in it. (2). The relatively thin leading edge always creates 3-D flow (with separation at off-design conditions, and even at the optimum design condition), not mentioning the complex 3-D scroll, 3-D volute flows. (3). Whether the current turbulence models can handle it or not is unknown. Both Fluent and CFX-tascflow can handle this types of flow problems, but the results depends strongly on the users experience. I have used both codes, I think both are useful. What you need is more experience with the code and the radial machines. Codes alone will not solve your problem, not even a starting geometry.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 1999, 16:52
Default Re: CFD for turbomachinery
  #3
Erich F.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
We presented a sample problem for a number of the commercial based codes to solve and based our selection on that. The willingness (or lack) of the individual CFD code suppliers, should help your choice, too. You might add CFDRC to your list, as well as others, but their results on your sample problem might help your choice. Several of the companies backed out after investigating our problem... and only one of the group tested was close to laboratory results - we bought this code after a trial period.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 27, 1999, 01:35
Default Re: CFD for turbomachinery
  #4
Jurek
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Which code was the best in your case ?
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 27, 1999, 09:47
Default Re: CFD for turbomachinery
  #5
Erich F.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Numeca's Fine Turbo was not in our competition at that time, so the closest for our application was TASCflow. It was about 4 years ago and I had not heard of them (Numeca)...

So far we are pleased with TASCflow, but no commercial code is perfect. Would be nice to have several, but ...

We have an ideal setup in that our labs can verify/challenge our CFD results, which help with modeling practices, etc.
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 6, 1999, 01:53
Default Re: CFD for turbomachinery
  #6
clifford bradford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
it's a question of ease of problem setup (geom import, mesh gen, post processing, availability of moving boundaries etc) specific to turbomachinery as much as accuracy. a code with turbomachinery specific features (i think CFX has a turbomachinery specific version as does numeca)-look in turbomachinery magazines, would take away a lot of headache. erich also has a good idea give your candidates a test problem (have them use your CAD files etc)and make them put up or shut up. also make sure they can customise their software to your computers. a lot of these companies want you to pay big $ to use their program then tell you to get new computers to run it. go for the company that going to give you accurate, usable software and is going to kiss your ass too! it's your money
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 0 February 13, 2002 13:23
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 22:10
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2000 04:49
Since Last June John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 3 July 12, 1999 09:38
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15.