CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Modify NS eqns for moving body

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 6, 2006, 21:23
Default Modify NS eqns for moving body
  #1
Northstar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
May I know if I need to add linear acceleration terms like mass X acceleration into the momentum eqn if I am going to model a moving body. the grid will stay with the body and move together with it up and down sinusoidally ?

If so, what is the term exactly that must be added?

thank you.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 7, 2006, 04:24
Default Re: Modify NS eqns for moving body
  #2
ganesh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Northstar,

The velocities need to be replaced by (Velocity minus Grid Velocity), leading to the so called ALE formulation. You could refer to papers on moving grids for more information on the same. It is trivial to see that the formulation reduces to the standard one when grid velocity vanishes ie. static case.

Hope this helps

Regards

Ganesh

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 8, 2006, 12:03
Default Re: Modify NS eqns for moving body
  #3
Northstar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thank you Ganesh!

however, since it is moving up/down sinusoidally , there will be acceleration (by differentiating twice) up/down as well. hence is there a need to add some sort of "grid acceleration" into the momentum eqn as well?

thanks again.
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 9, 2006, 01:53
Default Re: Modify NS eqns for moving body
  #4
ganesh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Northstar,

It is improtant to note that the ALE formulation takes the relative velocity into picture. Thus the fluxes would read as rho*(u-grid_vel) rather than rho*u only. If you derive the equations, or just replace the velocity componenents, by the relative velocity you would see the effect. The fact that the grid is in motion is actually absorbed into the ALE formulation. It is also nice if you start the derivation from the basics, just use a CV approach, with the boundary in motion, and you will see the relative velocity in picture.

Please do not confuse the ALE formulation as such with non-inertial frame of reference, where the reference frame itself is in motion, and hence other issues such as Coriolis forces will come into play. The present formulation is essentially inertial, the refernce frame is moving with the body and the relative velocity accounts for it.

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Ganesh
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to set periodic boundary conditions Ganesh FLUENT 13 January 22, 2014 05:11
6DOF with floating body bounce back. paka FLUENT 4 June 6, 2013 11:32
How to modify the stress tensor of momentum eqns. Jason FLUENT 1 November 26, 2010 06:20
Body in windtunnel - high preassure behind the body? Andyjoe OpenFOAM 4 February 16, 2010 11:57
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:24.