CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

DO NOT WAIT TIME ON EXA POWER(LESS)FLOW

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 21, 2006, 11:48
Default DO NOT WAIT TIME ON EXA POWER(LESS)FLOW
  #1
Is known as Mr CFD at my workplace
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've been doing CFD for a number of years. My experience taught me that if something sounds too good to be true - then it normally is not true ! One example I can think of is EXA Powerflow - sold as revolutionary, effectless, 21 century (at one stage, even no need for turbulence models)bla bla bla...... It turns out powerflow is only powerful for generating pretty pictures (GENERATING UN-PHYSICAL EFFECTS AS SIDE PRODUCT). Exa salemen are the worse liars I ever came across - DO NOT BELIEVE A WORD THEY SAID - COMPLETELY WASTE OF TIME !
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 21, 2006, 12:12
Default Re: DO NOT WAIT TIME ON EXA POWER(LESS)FLOW
  #2
Jonas Larsson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Oh, that is interesting to hear, I was under the impression that Exa was doing quite well now, especially in the automotive sector. Many car manufacturers have started using Exa in the last couple of years. Have you run Exa in any benchmarks against other more traditional CFD codes?
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2006, 09:05
Default please elaborate
  #3
pc
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you're going to bad mouth a product you should at least provide some details supporting your statements.

What were you trying to simulate? Were you comparing with analytic results? Solutions from other codes? What were the "un-physical effects" you observed?
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 22, 2006, 10:45
Default Re: please elaborate
  #4
Makaveli
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This view seems to be one that's been around for a long while now (doing a quick search of this site) with a lot of bad mouthing going on and it does seem that the sales people at EXA have told a few (well maybe allot) of mis-truths. But as Jonas has stated powerflow seems to have found a niche market in external automotive aerodynamics with companies such as BMW, karmann and Volkswagen-Audi group using it. I have read an internal report from VW on the development of the Phaeton comparing results gained with powerflow with wind tunnel testing, the report showed a strong correlation between the tests and the CFD (sorry can't say too much more due to confidentiality agreements). I believe the reason for this is the complex geometry prevents powerflow from poorly predicting separation (a problem I understand it suffers from - again from this forum).

I have not used the software myself as I cannot afford to buy a licence for a second CFD code (I am currently using Fluent) but it is my belief that powerflow seems suitable for the niche it has found. It also has some very interesting features, including a very easy meshing system and although the "21st century CFD" seems a little rich, a Boltzmann Lattice solver is a an interesting addition to the CFD community. Maybe given as much development time as the current crop of FVM and FE solvers it will become just as multi-purpose, providing reliable results for a number of situations.

As pc said can you elaborate on your problems with powerflow as this is an area of interest to me. I have read "Evaluation of PowerFLOW for aerodynamic applications" (http://research.nianet.org/~luo/journal-pubs.html) and I am aware of the problems outlined in it but this paper is a little old now so some more information regarding newer versions would be nice.

  Reply With Quote

Old   March 24, 2006, 09:05
Default guess not
  #5
pc
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I guess he didn't have much more to add....
  Reply With Quote

Old   March 27, 2006, 10:40
Default Re: guess not
  #6
Makaveli
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Looks that way. I was hoping for an interesting debate, but unsubstantiated accusations just amount to tabloid-esque slander, not debate. Shame
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 6, 2006, 23:13
Default Re: DO NOT WAIT TIME ON EXA POWER(LESS)FLOW
  #7
anonymous
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unfortunately CFD has become a commodity and many sales managers are under tremendous pressure to make numbers each quarter. In may experience CFD shopping I have found the Fluent staff most reputable (mostly PhD, CFD literate). The less sophisticated the product the less sophisticated the sales staff. CFdesign sales staff are by far least trustworthy and product is junk. If the sales person is not an engineer by training beware.
  Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2006, 08:42
Default CFdesign? *NM*
  #8
guang ai
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Extrusion with OpenFoam problem No. Iterations 0 Lord Kelvin OpenFOAM 6 April 12, 2011 12:24
air bubble is disappear increasing time using vof xujjun CFX 9 June 9, 2009 08:59
DPM UDF particle position using the macro P_POS(p)[i] dm2747 FLUENT 0 April 17, 2009 02:29
Convergence moving mesh lr103476 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 30 November 19, 2007 15:09
unsteady calcs in FLUENT Sanjay Padhiar Main CFD Forum 1 March 31, 1999 12:32


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:46.