CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

No recirculation zone, why??

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree3Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 19, 2013, 12:06
Default
  #21
Senior Member
 
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 196
Rep Power: 6
Aeronautics El. K. is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by o_mars_2010 View Post
I have a very strange results:
When i set the kinematic viscosity as 1.04e-6 i have no recirculation zone.
however, when i set it to 1e-2 i clearly see the recirculation zone.
i calculate the free stream velocity according to the relation i mentioned above in both cases of viscosity.
could you please explain to me why this happened???
Water's kinematic viscosity at T=293K is 1.004e-6(m^2/s) and not 1.04e-6.
(http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/wa...ity-d_596.html)

Another thing that I always ensure is to scale the grid. For example, if you have created the grid with the dimensions in mm, then before running your simulation you should convert your grid's dimensions from mm to m.
o_mars_2010 likes this.
__________________
Lefteris

Aeronautics El. K. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 11, 2013, 05:53
Default
  #22
Member
 
Osman
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 5
o_mars_2010 is on a distinguished road
The recirculation length L/D at Re=40 is around 2, however, from literature i found that it is in the range 2.2~2.4.
Could you please tell me what could be the reason??
(I used different grid size, however i got the same results)
In addition, i am using Tecplot to calculate the drag coefficient.
For example: If the Cylinder radius is for example R=0.05 & the grid size is dx=0.01
I could not get accurate results for the drag coefficient if the the calculation is taking place with the same radious.
But, i get accurate results for the drag coefficient if i used a radious smaller than the actual radious such as R=0.0485.
What could be the reason????
o_mars_2010 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2013, 08:32
Default
  #23
Senior Member
 
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 196
Rep Power: 6
Aeronautics El. K. is on a distinguished road
I would use much smaller grid spacing. dx=0.01 is too large I think compared to diameter of the cylinder.

Quote:
Originally Posted by o_mars_2010 View Post
The recirculation length L/D at Re=40 is around 2, however, from literature i found that it is in the range 2.2~2.4.
Could you please tell me what could be the reason??
(I used different grid size, however i got the same results)
In addition, i am using Tecplot to calculate the drag coefficient.
For example: If the Cylinder radius is for example R=0.05 & the grid size is dx=0.01
I could not get accurate results for the drag coefficient if the the calculation is taking place with the same radious.
But, i get accurate results for the drag coefficient if i used a radious smaller than the actual radious such as R=0.0485.
What could be the reason????
o_mars_2010 likes this.
__________________
Lefteris

Aeronautics El. K. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2013, 09:33
Default
  #24
Member
 
Osman
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 5
o_mars_2010 is on a distinguished road
Thanks a lot for your reply.
what about the 2nd half of my question about tecplot!!
i am using Tecplot to calculate the drag coefficient.
For example: If the Cylinder radius is for example R=0.05 & the grid size is dx=0.01
I could not get accurate results for the drag coefficient if the the calculation is taking place with the same radious.
But, i get accurate results for the drag coefficient if i used a radious bigger than the actual radious such as R=0.055.
What could be the reason????
o_mars_2010 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 28, 2013, 12:27
Default
  #25
Senior Member
 
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 196
Rep Power: 6
Aeronautics El. K. is on a distinguished road
I don't really get it.
Why don't you just compute in your code the force on the cylinder?
__________________
Lefteris

Aeronautics El. K. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 29, 2013, 07:35
Default
  #26
Member
 
Osman
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 51
Rep Power: 5
o_mars_2010 is on a distinguished road
Actually, now, i am calculating it in my code (Immersed Boundary Code).
The drag coefficient is excellently matching the reference data at Re=185
However, the lift coefficient is small around 0.302
In reference data it is around 0.42
Do you have any suggestion??
o_mars_2010 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
fluentMeshToFoam multidomain mesh conversion problem Attesz OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 12 May 2, 2013 10:52
Mesh conversion problem (fluent3DMeshToFoam) Aadhavan OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 1 December 12, 2012 11:38
[ICEM] Export ICEM mesh to Gambit / Fluent romekr ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 November 26, 2011 13:11
Problem in running ICEM grid in Openfoam Tarak OpenFOAM 6 September 9, 2011 17:51
Problem in IMPORT of ICEM input file in FLUENT csvirume FLUENT 2 September 9, 2009 01:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41.