
[Sponsors] 
February 26, 2013, 06:00 
'SIMPLE' question

#1 
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 16 
Hello to everyone!
I have a question regarding the SIMPLEalgorithm for finite volumes. The derivation of the algorithm starts (in different books) with the discretized momentum equation, such as: A_p * u_p + SUM (A_x * u_x) = Q_p  pressure gradient_p I am a bit confused about this equation: I though we need the volume integrated momentum equation to start with, with conservative integrations of all terms  because that is what we are interested in, in FV. Here, the derivation starts with something that looks like the momentum equation itself. Or I can not explain the appearance of the pressure gradient... Can someone clear this up for me?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. 

February 26, 2013, 07:28 

#2 
Senior Member
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK, Greece
Posts: 187
Rep Power: 5 
If my memory is not failing me, this is derived from the integral form of the momentum equation by approximating each of its terms.
__________________
Lefteris 

February 26, 2013, 14:09 

#3 
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 16 
Then, I am confused by the Ferziger / Peric book. They say that nearly all commercial codes use the conservative form of integrating the pressure term. Later they explain SIMPLE, SIMPLEC,... using a derivation that starts with the non conservative form.
Anyway, what you say, means that the cell volume "dV" is taken from the "pressure gradient_p" term and put into the coefficients of the other summands, correct?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. 

February 26, 2013, 15:25 

#4  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,587
Rep Power: 20 
Quote:
The key is that the integrals are approximated by centred second order formulas (mean value approximation). This often leads to have discrete equations that appears similar both for FV and FD. The confusion vanishes for higher order of accuracy 

February 27, 2013, 14:00 

#5 
Senior Member
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 16 
I was talking about conservative and nonconservative formulation. It looks like they use a nonconservative pressure integral, although they previously state that nearly everyone (commercial) uses the conservative form.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower. 

February 27, 2013, 17:20 

#6  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,587
Rep Power: 20 
Quote:
The fluxintegrated form of the pressure term should write as Int [S] n.(pI) dS but I think that by using the volume average of the pressure gradient, the second order discretization is done with the mean value formula therefore it seems a nonconservative formula ... 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Simple Outlet Question  m.nichols19  OpenFOAM  3  June 25, 2010 01:44 
Simple Question Regarding Symmetry Planes  Atella  CFX  3  April 11, 2010 06:44 
Simple Question Regarding Symmetry Planes  Atella  Main CFD Forum  0  April 9, 2010 10:58 
Question of Anil Date's SIMPLE method  universez  Main CFD Forum  0  November 18, 2009 21:12 
Simple Question Regarding Continuity Closure  RC  FLUENT  2  March 25, 2004 06:30 