CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

'SIMPLE' question

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 26, 2013, 06:00
Lightbulb 'SIMPLE' question
  #1
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 16
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
Hello to everyone!

I have a question regarding the SIMPLE-algorithm for finite volumes.
The derivation of the algorithm starts (in different books) with the discretized momentum equation, such as:

A_p * u_p + SUM (A_x * u_x) = Q_p - pressure gradient_p

I am a bit confused about this equation:
I though we need the volume integrated momentum equation to start with, with conservative integrations of all terms - because that is what we are interested in, in FV. Here, the derivation starts with something that looks like the momentum equation itself. Or I can not explain the appearance of the pressure gradient...

Can someone clear this up for me?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2013, 07:28
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK, Greece
Posts: 189
Rep Power: 5
Aeronautics El. K. is on a distinguished road
If my memory is not failing me, this is derived from the integral form of the momentum equation by approximating each of its terms.
__________________
Lefteris

Aeronautics El. K. is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2013, 14:09
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 16
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
Then, I am confused by the Ferziger / Peric book. They say that nearly all commercial codes use the conservative form of integrating the pressure term. Later they explain SIMPLE, SIMPLEC,... using a derivation that starts with the non conservative form.

Anyway, what you say, means that the cell volume "dV" is taken from the "pressure gradient_p" term and put into the coefficients of the other summands, correct?
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2013, 15:25
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,647
Rep Power: 23
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodriguezFatz View Post
Then, I am confused by the Ferziger / Peric book. They say that nearly all commercial codes use the conservative form of integrating the pressure term. Later they explain SIMPLE, SIMPLEC,... using a derivation that starts with the non conservative form.

Anyway, what you say, means that the cell volume "dV" is taken from the "pressure gradient_p" term and put into the coefficients of the other summands, correct?

The key is that the integrals are approximated by centred second order formulas (mean value approximation). This often leads to have discrete equations that appears similar both for FV and FD.
The confusion vanishes for higher order of accuracy
FMDenaro is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2013, 14:00
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
RodriguezFatz's Avatar
 
Philipp
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,097
Rep Power: 16
RodriguezFatz will become famous soon enough
I was talking about conservative and non-conservative formulation. It looks like they use a non-conservative pressure integral, although they previously state that nearly everyone (commercial) uses the conservative form.
__________________
The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.
RodriguezFatz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 27, 2013, 17:20
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,647
Rep Power: 23
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by RodriguezFatz View Post
I was talking about conservative and non-conservative formulation. It looks like they use a non-conservative pressure integral, although they previously state that nearly everyone (commercial) uses the conservative form.

The flux-integrated form of the pressure term should write as

Int [S] n.(pI) dS

but I think that by using the volume average of the pressure gradient, the second order discretization is done with the mean value formula therefore it seems a non-conservative formula ...
FMDenaro is online now   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Simple Outlet Question m.nichols19 OpenFOAM 3 June 25, 2010 01:44
Simple Question Regarding Symmetry Planes Atella CFX 3 April 11, 2010 06:44
Simple Question Regarding Symmetry Planes Atella Main CFD Forum 0 April 9, 2010 10:58
Question of Anil Date's SIMPLE method universez Main CFD Forum 0 November 18, 2009 21:12
Simple Question Regarding Continuity Closure RC FLUENT 2 March 25, 2004 06:30


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:50.