CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

hexahedra elements & accuracy???????

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 9, 2006, 10:13
Default hexahedra elements & accuracy???????
  #1
vijesh joshi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello friends. I have a question. Is there any relation between the type of element used and the accuracy?? I am using CFX software. In the help files, it has not been given. Please help me. Regards, VVJ.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2009, 14:01
Default hexahedral vs tetrahedral
  #2
Senior Member
 
Eric Nutsch
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon USA
Posts: 112
Rep Power: 7
ericnutsch is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ericnutsch
Serval professors have informed me that a Hexahedral mesh is more acurate in the boundary layer. Tetrahedrals have less skew computational issues and are better over irregular geometry or when expanding the size of the cells away from the geometry(size function).

I am curious however as to how much more accurate they are; since in the opensource world tetrahedrals are much easier to generate.

(Anyone) Do you think it would take twice as many
tetrahedrals, three times as many, four, or more to be equivalent to
the quality of a hexahedral boundary layer mesh?
ericnutsch is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2009, 17:12
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Charles
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 9
CapSizer is on a distinguished road
Well, in real life this is actually a very complex question with no simple answer. There are theoretical methods that should give you the relative accuracies, but in my experience practical concerns tend to override these. For example, it can depend on the topology of whatever it is that you are meshing. When it comes to something very regular like a 3D wing, for example, a tetrahedral grid may require 10 times as many cells as a hexa grid, for equivalent accuracy.

It is also noticeable how fast certain types of unstructured hexa grids will converge, by virtue of minimal skewness and good cell aspect ratios. I have sometimes seen a poor quality hexa grid produce better results than a good tetra grid. It rather depends on where the bad cells are, and how resistant the solver is to being tripped up by these bad cells.
CapSizer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 3, 2009, 17:32
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 210
Rep Power: 8
kingjewel1 is on a distinguished road
Can I refer you to this paper by Hefny and OOka: CFD analysis of pollutant dispersion around buildings: effect of cell geometry, Building and Environment 44 (2009)
kingjewel1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 4, 2009, 15:37
Default hexahedral mesh is _x as acurate
  #5
Senior Member
 
Eric Nutsch
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Eugene, Oregon USA
Posts: 112
Rep Power: 7
ericnutsch is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to ericnutsch
Thanks CapSizer! You are the first person to put forth a number. 10 times means a whole lot more than "more". Im not going to base any calcultions on it, but it is good to have a feeling for the numbers before you choose a direction.

Thanks for the ref kingjewel1. Here is the abstract if anyone else is interested:
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=21358896



If anyone else has had different experiences please post them. Thanks!
ericnutsch is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Temporal accuracy ganesh Main CFD Forum 0 February 29, 2008 06:32
Hexahedran elements and accuracy???? vijesh joshi CFX 0 May 9, 2006 10:14
Penetrating elements in extruded mesh Michael P CFX 2 May 20, 2005 08:06
accuracy of Discontinuous Galerkin Qu Kun Main CFD Forum 0 September 6, 2004 09:19
CFX4.3 -build analysis form Chie Min CFX 5 July 12, 2001 23:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:44.