CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Departure from Kolmogorovs -5/3 law

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 10, 2013, 11:18
Default Departure from Kolmogorovs -5/3 law
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7
jd88 is on a distinguished road
I have a time dependent turbulent velocity signal and have computed a power spectral density. What is the significance of the slope, in what appears to be the inertial subrange, not being equal to -5/3? In some regions of the flow the slope is -5/3 but in other regions it is not. In the regions where the slope is not -5/3 the turbulence intensity is considerably less (but not 0) than the regions where the slope is -5/3. I suspect in some of these regions the turbulence is still developing. Could another potential explanation be that because the local turbulence intensities are small, the local turbulence Reynolds number is smaller and therefore the separation between the large scales and the small scales is not sufficient for the inertial subrange to form?

Also in some of these regions the slope is larger and in some regions it is smaller than -5/3.
jd88 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 10, 2013, 12:08
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,662
Rep Power: 23
FMDenaro will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd88 View Post
I have a time dependent turbulent velocity signal and have computed a power spectral density. What is the significance of the slope, in what appears to be the inertial subrange, not being equal to -5/3? In some regions of the flow the slope is -5/3 but in other regions it is not. In the regions where the slope is not -5/3 the turbulence intensity is considerably less (but not 0) than the regions where the slope is -5/3. I suspect in some of these regions the turbulence is still developing. Could another potential explanation be that because the local turbulence intensities are small, the local turbulence Reynolds number is smaller and therefore the separation between the large scales and the small scales is not sufficient for the inertial subrange to form?

Also in some of these regions the slope is larger and in some regions it is smaller than -5/3.
k^-5/3 is only a theoretical law derived from theory... it assumes homogeneity, isotropy... in general flows there is no reasons to have appearence of this slope...
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Non-Newtonian Power Law for Viscosity John FLUENT 6 November 26, 2014 09:44
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
Using ideal gas law and sutherland law in Fluent RyGuy FLUENT 4 June 28, 2012 02:07
k-5/3 law in frequency domain hatef_khaledi Main CFD Forum 0 November 30, 2010 10:50
questions about the DPM law rookie FLUENT 0 June 16, 2003 11:41


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:19.