# Best turbulance model for analysis

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 12, 2013, 02:25 Best turbulance model for analysis #1 New Member   adi Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 13 Rep Power: 4 I am doing a undergraduate research for calculating drag force and co-efficient of drag on heavy vehicle. please suggest me best turbulence model which one i should select for more realistic and accurate result. And please tell me should i scale down my model or i should perform analysis on full length model?? nd Wht should be OPTIMUM no of iteration for convergence?? I am using SOLIDWORKS FLOW & AUTODESK CFD.

 March 15, 2013, 16:18 #2 Senior Member     ATM Join Date: May 2009 Location: United States Posts: 104 Rep Power: 8 Dear Addy, 1) There is no such thing as "best" turbulence model... but usually in these cases k-epsilon / Spalart - Allmaras models are preferred ( and well documented for external flows, so you can refer) 2) Scaling is really your choice, provided a good scaling factor exists for your problem. Else, its safer to do a full length sim. But if you want a good solution and want to observe the trailing vortices etc. from the vehicle, you might have to make the near wall mesh quite fine, and this will increase your computation time. 3) There is no such thing as the optimum no. iterations for convergence in turbulent flow simulations. you can give a reasonably low tolerance criteria for the residuals. The residuals going down is a good indication of convergence,but not the only one. You can also observe the flow statistics , like averaging of the velocity fields etc. and when you get something close to a statistically stationary/uniform field, you can say that the simulation has converged (almost)

 March 16, 2013, 01:51 Thank you sir!!! #3 New Member   adi Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 13 Rep Power: 4 One more thing i want to ask if i scale down my model then i have to increase the velocity in same proportion. Sir can u tell me what is the maximum speed till that we can neglect the effect of compressibility?? neglect the Effect of mach number on Coefficient of drag?? Please Reply..

 March 16, 2013, 11:47 #4 Senior Member   Lefteris Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: UK, Greece Posts: 187 Rep Power: 5 You have to adjust the velocity with respect to the characteristic length of your model in order to have the same Reynolds number. If the flow you're studying is not dominated by viscous effects (which in your case I believe it's not) then you can approximate the flow as incompressible if the Mach number is less than 0.3 (Ma<0.3). __________________ Lefteris

 March 31, 2013, 14:04 #5 New Member   mohammed mahdi Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: Sudan, Khartoum Posts: 6 Rep Power: 7 the appropriate turbulent model for aerodynamics application according to Tinoco is K-omega SST with transiltional flow.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post chiven OpenFOAM Bugs 7 August 23, 2011 02:52 liuyuxuan FLUENT 1 October 2, 2009 15:25 gravis Main CFD Forum 0 October 2, 2009 10:27 sherifkadry CFX 2 September 7, 2009 20:51 rystokes CFX 3 August 9, 2009 19:13

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:49.