CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

CFD for dummies

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 6, 2013, 16:27
Default CFD for dummies
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Fruit is on a distinguished road
Hello

Is there a simple CFD system? I mean really simple. By the way it should be free.

In fact, I'm not entirely new to CFD. When studied in university I even wrote a very simple 2D NS-solver for laminar flows (theoretically, for turbulent too, but it was a direct solver using an explicit scheme so you can estimate time needed to solve a problem with Re far from 1). But I didn't go any deeper and haven't been working with CFD for a long time. I often can't understand if simulation aborted due to wrong CFL number, relaxation factors (I even can hardly recollect what do these magic words mean), erroneous boundary conditions or bad mesh.

At the moment I'm designing a fiction supersonic aircraft. I do it just for fun. But I want to make an airplane which looks like an airplane able to fly - there are many pictures made by artists without any limitations representing aircrafts with absurd, impossible forms. I don't want to make another flying saucer or X-wing. So I want to test my aircraft in some CDF system.

First I tried FlowVision. It's a Russian system with Russian documentation and so as I'm Russian myself, I tried it. All was good until I proceeded from tutorials to real problems. There was no person who could help me to find a mistake. In addition demo version of FV is limited by 15000 cells so I turned to other software. OpenFLOW seemed to be a good choice even though it was for *nix systems but it's too complicated. I can learn new meshing software, OpenFOAM config files and ParaView and I will do it if there will be no other choice but I want something easier. I tried Caedium and it was good. But when I replaced a sphere with a cone it started generate bad mesh. And yes, it's only trial. I found information about some NASA solvers but they are only for americans. I found SU^2 but, again, it needs external meshing tool and postproc...

So. As far as I understood, it is only a miracle that can help me to find easy software. Maybe someone of you is a wizard's friend? If not, would you please give me some advice about what combination of tools to choose? Which is simpler to learn, OpenFOAM with its standard tools or SU^2 (with which mesher)? Or maybe there is another combination "preproc - solver - postproc" which is simpler than either OpenFOAM or SU^2?
Fruit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 6, 2013, 16:34
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
JR22's Avatar
 
Jose Rey
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 122
Rep Power: 8
JR22 will become famous soon enough
You can try OpenFoam via Helyx-OS (GUI tool). That's a good entry point. Once you grow out of Helyx-OS, you can start diving deeper into OpenFoam. The one caveat is that you have to install it in Linux (preferably Ubuntu 12.04). I installed it inside a Virtual Box and works well. After you get it installed, here is a video that runs you through an external aerodynamics simulation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJbFnFzDLqo
JR22 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 7, 2013, 01:55
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Martin Hegedus
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 497
Rep Power: 9
Martin Hegedus is on a distinguished road
OpenFOAM is not a coupled solver therefore it will not converge for transonic steady state solutions. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong. You'll need to focus on SU2 or Overture, http://www.overtureframework.org/.

Edit: I'm not sure if Overture implements turbulence models.
Martin Hegedus is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 0 February 13, 2002 13:23
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 22:10
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2000 04:49
Since Last June John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 3 July 12, 1999 09:38
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15.