CFD Online URL
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Vortex method vs High Reynolds number

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 3, 2006, 12:36
Default Vortex method vs High Reynolds number
  #1
Weili
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I'm currently working on a code, solving incompressible 3D flow using discrete vortex method. The new idea (probably not that new) for this method is the use of a grid system and finite volume method. But, the problem is that I can only carry out simulations for a Reynolds number lower than 1000, othervise the simulation would become unstable. What could be the reasons for this limitation? the differential scheme ? or grid resolution? Hope someone here could help me out. Thanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2006, 02:15
Default Re: Vortex method vs High Reynolds number
  #2
Adrin Gharakhani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I think I have seen a recent paper doing exactly as you suggest; using finite volume methods but using bio-savart law to get the velocities at the finite volume interfaces. If this is what you're doing it isn't new. Hopefully, it's not a thesis material ) (BTW, discrete vortex method has a distinct connotation, which assumes a meshless computation). As for your questions, it's too general ...

Adrin
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two way particle coupling in OF 2.0 and the particle reynolds number preichl OpenFOAM 7 February 9, 2012 16:38
Reynolds Number Matt CFX 0 February 25, 2009 06:40
BlockMeshmergePatchPairs hjasak OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 11 August 15, 2008 08:36
Reynolds number help Mech FLUENT 0 March 15, 2006 11:28
Multicomponent fluid Andrea CFX 2 October 11, 2004 06:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:17.