
[Sponsors] 
July 13, 2013, 10:35 
Boundary condition

#1 
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 4 

July 13, 2013, 11:37 

#2 
Senior Member
Lefteris
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: UK, Greece
Posts: 187
Rep Power: 5 
You have to set boundary conditions on all the boundaries of your domain.
__________________
Lefteris 

July 13, 2013, 12:21 

#3  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,640
Rep Power: 23 
Quote:
First, the boundary conditions must be prescribed according to the mathematical character of the system, hyperbolic and parabolic equations require BCs on open domains, only elliptic equations require to prescribe BCs on the whole frontier. Second, I see that this is not exactly a coupled system, you can solve the second equation indipendently. Also, the equation for B does not prescribe a dependence on y. 

July 15, 2013, 04:33 

#4  
New Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 4 
Quote:
Thank you for your reply. I agree with your first point. I think I don't have to specify the y boundary condition for B. The second equation will evolve by itself as you point out. But, is coupling a problem? What about I guess I still don't have to specify the y boundary condition in B, is that? Because there is no ydirection propagation in the second equation. 

July 15, 2013, 04:51 

#5 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,640
Rep Power: 23 
Quote:
But this second equation is now different ...it contains A and is coupled to the first. In any case it is valid for any y... I suggest to classify the system.... Then, at a steady state, if A <> 0 you see that B must be a function only of y, then from the first equation you have dA/dx = f(y) > A(x,y) = f(y) (xx0) + A0 Last edited by FMDenaro; July 15, 2013 at 06:48. 

August 18, 2013, 11:42 

#6  
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 6 
Quote:
I would say that I agree with Aeronautics. When you will discretize the first equation for A, you will need to know B at the boundary since you have the operator dB/dy involved in the equation. However if you use left sided FD scheme instead of central scheme you could avoid to specify B on the boundary. Indeed you don't have y propagation of B in the B equation, but you have it on the A equation. So everything will depend on the scheme you use to discretize dB/dy in the A equation. 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Radiation interface  hinca  CFX  15  January 26, 2014 18:11 
Error finding variable "THERMX"  sunilpatil  CFX  8  April 26, 2013 07:00 
Setting outlet Pressure boundary condition using CAFFA code  Mukund Pondkule  Main CFD Forum  0  March 16, 2011 04:23 
Domain Imbalance  HMR  CFX  3  March 6, 2011 21:10 
How exactly the "pressure outlet" bdry condition compute properties on the boundary?  yating9901  FLUENT  3  June 28, 2010 12:26 