CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Grid independency test

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By cfdnewbie

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 17, 2013, 02:05
Question Grid independency test
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4
prom is on a distinguished road
Can anybody tell me what is the reason for not achieving grid independency?
prom is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 17, 2013, 03:11
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,104
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
There is a multitude of possible reasons.
If you describe more in detail what you did, what you expected and what you got...
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2013, 06:27
Default grid independency
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4
prom is on a distinguished road
I want to simulate swirling flow in a cylinder and just wanted to do the grid independency test. But I got different plots of swirl and axial velocities near wall and axis region. I just wanted to know the reason for this behaviour. Does this happens or is there any mistakes in my simulation?
prom is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 18, 2013, 06:54
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
cfdnewbie
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 551
Rep Power: 11
cfdnewbie is on a distinguished road
Is the flow laminar or turbulent? What is your resolution in terms of the smallest scales in the flow? Do you use any type of model? Tell us more about the numerics you are using to solve this flow. Has the code been verified?

There are so many possible explanations for this behavior. You need to provide the parameters of your physics and your numerics for us to help you.
FMDenaro likes this.
cfdnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2013, 01:06
Default grid independency
  #5
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 4
prom is on a distinguished road
I am simulating turbulent swirling flow using CFX in a cylinder using standard k-e model. meshing is done using icem cfd. I just increase the number of nodes on inlet face by multiples of 5 to find out grid independency.
prom is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2013, 03:10
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,104
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
Decreasing the cell size in only one region of the mesh will not reduce the discretization error in the other (constant-size) regions of the mesh.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2013, 06:43
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Adrian
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Dublin
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 5
adunne304 is on a distinguished road
The k-e model can tend to give strange grid convergence results if you are decreasing the first cell height at the walls with increasing mesh refinement. Check to see that your wall functions are valid, or switch to a more appropriate turbulence model.
__________________
www.idacireland.com
adunne304 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 18, 2013, 11:13
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 251
Rep Power: 7
leflix is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by prom View Post
Can anybody tell me what is the reason for not achieving grid independency?

This kind of tests are very important to show that the solution you obtained
is accurate enough. You should know that your solution is dependent on the size of your grid cells. The smaller is your cells, the more accurate your solution will be. But below a given grid size the solution becomes independent of this size. It means that you stop to gain accuracy below this given grid size. Then it is not anylonger necessary to decrease the grid size.
So you have to perform this test to be sure that you have run your computation with the right grid size.
Keep in mind that these tests may concern spatial grid size (dx, dy) or time step (dt)

To my mind these tests should be always performed before delivering any solution.This is a must.
leflix is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 19, 2013, 06:59
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Julien de Charentenay
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 229
Rep Power: 9
julien.decharentenay is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Skype™ to julien.decharentenay
Keep in mind, as suggested by Adrian, that some models, such as wall functions, are dependent on the mesh/time-step size. Other models to look out for includes: solidification, melting, evaporation...

Another aspect is that when doing mesh/time-step refinement, the accuracy of the solution increases (and the dissipation goes down). This creates a "conflict" where you are able to achieve convergence for coarse mesh, but fine mesh may exhibit transient behaviour...
__________________
---
Julien de Charentenay
julien.decharentenay is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 19, 2013, 10:06
Default
  #10
Member
 
Sheng
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 58
Rep Power: 6
micro11sl is on a distinguished road
Hello prom,
I just recomend a book verification and validation. There's a very detailed discussion on this topic. Other replies in this forum are also valuable.

This book is, Roache, P. J., Fundamentals of Verification and Validation, 2nd eds, Hermosa publishers, 2009.
micro11sl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 9, 2013, 06:40
Default Gid
  #11
New Member
 
steven
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 4
stevenwendt2003 is on a distinguished road
Dear
GID is varies from case to case , you need to conduct a timestep independence study.
Reagrds
stevenwendt2003 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ANSYS Meshing] Build grid: Aborted due to critical error srikrishnacs ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 August 2, 2013 14:15
Mesh Conversion : structured to unstructured shreyasr ANSYS 7 April 13, 2013 09:34
time independency - grid independency hamid1 FLUENT 0 January 20, 2012 06:06
Obtain Geometry Data from a Grid File in CFX 10.0 ARJUN CFX 2 August 17, 2006 07:20
Troubles modelling flow through a grid Hans Klaufus CFX 1 June 28, 2000 16:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44.