# Isotropic EV

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 July 22, 2013, 12:59 Isotropic EV #1 New Member   Darryl McClure Join Date: Dec 2011 Posts: 5 Rep Power: 5 I am studying Prandtl's secondary flow of the second kind and have stumbled upon something that I can't make sense of. Many authors state that the normal Re stresses are all equal to with turbulence models relying on the Boussinesq approximation for closure. But when I finally looked at the approximation myself (incompressible): It gives What assumption or piece of logic allows each of the normal Re stresses to equal ? I have also seen a statement in a thread that the shear Re stresses are all zero when using Boussinesq for closure. Any explanation on this point as well? Because the Boussinesq approximation equation seems to refute both of these claims. Any corrections or comments on my understanding are welcome. Thanks, Darryl

 July 22, 2013, 13:49 #2 Senior Member   Filippo Maria Denaro Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 1,651 Rep Power: 23 I am not sure to have fully understood your question ...Are you considering U as Reynolds averaged? Then (uu)bar= UU + (u'u')bar you will model (u'u')bar as supplementary eddy viscosity tensor Td but it must be zero traced. Therefore, you decompose in isotropic and deviatoric tensors Td=(1/3)I *Trace(Td) + Td0 For incompressible flows, the isotropic part is simply summed to the pressure and you solve for a global scalar field whose gradients ensure the divergence-free velocity. Sorry if I did not get the right meaning of your question ...

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post dut_thinker Main CFD Forum 6 January 2, 2013 12:10 Hall Main CFD Forum 8 April 28, 2011 16:55 Guoping Xia Main CFD Forum 0 March 12, 2006 22:54 gorka Main CFD Forum 2 June 30, 2003 15:41 tingguang Main CFD Forum 0 August 1, 2002 17:08

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:44.