CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Mesh independence study and Wall Y+

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree3Likes
  • 2 Post By sam
  • 1 Post By Mani

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 14, 2006, 00:18
Default Mesh independence study and Wall Y+
  #1
sam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dea all

I would to know about the issues related to mesh indepedence and Y+ .

1. What is relationship between Mesh indepdence and y+

2. First we set the y plus or mesh independence .

3. what should be the strategy for meshing while studying mesh independence

4. What should be the strategy for meshing while studying y+

Thanks in advance

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2006, 10:22
Default Re: Mesh independence study and Wall Y+
  #2
Mani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
That's a good question. I am assuming you are referring to turbulent flow. The y+ requirement comes from your turbulent model. Depending on the model, the first cell off the wall has to be within a certain y+ range. Whether the model uses wall functions or integrates to the wall will be an important factor. Anyway, as you perform your "mesh independence" study you should always meet this requirement. In other words, your grid resolution at the wall cannot be chosen arbitrarily low, or your mesh convergence study will be spoiled by a complete failure of the turbulence model.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2006, 22:32
Default Re: Mesh independence study and Wall Y+
  #3
sam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thats big problem. that implies that we have play simultanously with mesh indepdence study and first cell distance.

and .......................... main concern is that how to do it within the shortest possible time.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 15, 2006, 08:17
Default Re: Mesh independence study and Wall Y+
  #4
Mani
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
well, my point was that you should >not< play with the first cell distance --> keep it as required, i.e. it should stay the same for all grid resolutions. what you can do is to fix the first cell size but vary the stretching (in cell-normal direction) to get coarser outer resolutions.

alternatively, you can start with an acceptable grid and increase (not decrease) the resolution, making the first cell smaller, not larger. this will work well if your turbulence model integrates to the wall, and as long as your initial grid already resolved the laminar sublayer it will be a valid grid resolution study. however, this might be problematic for wall function methods, because they often require the first cell to stay within upper and lower limits. so, find out if your method uses wall functions or not, and then choose the appropriate approach.
miladrakhsha likes this.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Using a hybrid mesh for a simple pipe Udio_NT ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 17 October 18, 2012 14:42
increasing mesh quality is leading to poor convergence tippo CFX 2 May 5, 2009 10:55
A doubt on grid independence study G.Balakrishnan FLUENT 4 November 21, 2000 12:05
Tetrahedral vs. Hexahedral Meshing for CFD Andy Bartels Main CFD Forum 14 August 22, 2000 07:35
3-d elliptic generation mesh Gang Sun Main CFD Forum 5 September 16, 1998 00:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16.