CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Main Diffenrences between commercian packages ??

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 13, 2006, 05:33
Default Main Diffenrences between commercian packages ??
  #1
Abou
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all, I'm doing a research on the 3 main commercial CFD packages : Fluent, CFX and Star CD...

Could you help me ? I'm looking for the pro and cons of these codes, especially for the Aerospace Engineering... I already know that Fluent is not accurate for Highh speeds, but that's all I know.

Many thanks !!
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2006, 07:39
Default Re: Main Diffenrences between commercian packages
  #2
Ben
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Fluent big, part of the Ansys axis of evil, easy to use but getting on a coupled of segregated solver, t-grid is good, gambit is some form of toture....

CFX big, part of the Ansys axis of evil (again) no one quite knows how long it will be around for now they own Fluent, good for turbomachinery, coupled solver only, vertex based = massive memory usage and waiting all year for tranisent to run, easy to use so I hear, meshing is good but only really tet unless you are willing to pay more cash

STAR-CD Older but most flexible of the codes, not that easy to use but contains loads and loads models, best for combustion, owns another code STAR-CCM+ developed by a load of fluent guys, brand new easy to use great to look at very fluent like, choice of solvers, as good for aero as fluent but other physics capabilites are limited at the mo. both codes polyhedral

And thats about it not sure about the other codes

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2006, 08:15
Default Re: Main Diffenrences between commercian packages
  #3
opaque
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Ben,

Have you tried the Fluent 6.3beta? There is a polyhedral solver there and a new pressure based coupled solver..

It is supposed to converge faster than their pressure based segregated solver.. Of course, the memory requirements are larger but who would care when you could get the solution in a lot less wall clock time...

Good luck,

Opaque

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2006, 08:46
Default Re: Main Diffenrences between commercian packages
  #4
Ben
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yeah I heard about the polyhedrals and the pressure based coupled but I was under the impression that 6.2 and before had a coupled solver already, so what is the difference between this new pressure based coupled and the old coupled?
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2006, 13:19
Default Re: Main Diffenrences between commercian packages
  #5
opaque
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The solver type matrix will be something like

-------------------------------------------

| Segregated | Coupled |

-------------------------------------------

Version | 6.2 | 6.3 | 6.2 | 6.3 |

-------------------------------------------

Density | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |

-------------------------------------------

Pressure | Yes | Yes | NO | Yes |

-------------------------------------------

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 13, 2006, 14:05
Default Re: Main Diffenrences between commercian packages
  #6
Ben
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
cheers for that but i am interested in how the pressure based solver works, how it differs from the density based and why it is "better"
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 15, 2006, 19:34
Default Re: Main Diffenrences between commercian packages
  #7
zxaar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
gambit is some form of toture.... he he he ... true to some extent.

CFX big, part of the Ansys axis of evil (again) no one quite knows how long it will be around for now they own Fluent, good for turbomachinery, coupled solver only, vertex based = massive memory usage and waiting all year for tranisent to run

i am expriencing this. Just waiting waiting and waiting ..
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2006, 03:15
Default Re: Main Diffenrences between commercian packages
  #8
Abou
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi guys !

Thanks for your answers... Do you know why CFX is so long ??

many thanks !
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 16, 2006, 08:36
Default Re: Main Diffenrences between commercian packages
  #9
Phil
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Be careful when comparing transient run times - there are many factors that can affect this (convergence level and/or number of inner loops done within the timestep, etc). Best practice may be different with a coupled solver than with a segregated solver. For instance, with a coupled solver, you should be able to get away with fewer inner loops per timestep. (I have seen LES results with CFX where only one inner loop per timestep was necessary, even though with the default settings it would use 3 or 4.) You should optimize these things on your case before starting a long transient run.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
openfoam installation javad814 OpenFOAM 7 January 27, 2012 12:31
openfoam installation for algeria (dz) abbes OpenFOAM Installation 4 July 18, 2011 19:16
CFD Online Back on Main Server pete Site News & Announcements 0 March 31, 2011 18:14
CFX vs 'cheap cfd packages' Andrew CFX 7 December 21, 2007 12:00
Problem: graphics display in prostar main window Jiaying Xu CD-adapco 8 February 14, 2002 09:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:42.