CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Kutta Condition

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By sbaffini

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 16, 2013, 13:50
Default Kutta Condition
  #1
Gp7
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1
Rep Power: 0
Gp7 is on a distinguished road
Hi all!
From simple aerodynamic analysis performed by Fluent and Xfoil of the non viscous and incompressible flow around Naca 2412, I noticed that the Kutta condition is not satisfied (the cp is not unitary at trealing edge). Why?
Gp7 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 17, 2013, 03:51
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
sbaffini's Avatar
 
Paolo Lampitella
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Italy
Posts: 519
Blog Entries: 14
Rep Power: 17
sbaffini will become famous soon enough
There are three important facts you need to know:

1) The Kutta condition is an arbitrary (but very useful and clever) condition used to make inviscid calculations worth the effort for lifting aerodynamic problems. In a true inviscid flow around an airfoil no lift is generated and the rear stagnation point is not generally expected to be on the trailing edge. I only know of applications with the panel methods.

2) For real flows, the Cp=1 condition is not expected to be recovered at the trailing edge; that is, viscous losses will prevent the pressure from fully recovering in the rear stagnation point. However, it is generally the case (for streamlined bodies) that this point is at the trailing edge (that's why Kutta condition is clever).

3) As soon as you move from panel methods to any Finite Volume/Difference method something else happens as:

- Even if you set the computation as inviscid, the numerical method is likely to introduce a certain amount of numerical viscosity (especially in Fluent); hence the computation is actually resemblant of those in real flows, just with an artificial, grid dependent, numerical viscosity.

- the point above tells you that you don't actually need Kutta here (also because it is nearly impossible to fix it, i guess), just don't expect the Cp to recover stagnation point values at the trailing edge.
michujo likes this.
sbaffini is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFX fails to calculate a diffuser pipe flow shenying0710 CFX 7 March 26, 2013 05:13
Generalized Kutta condition? Numsgil Main CFD Forum 1 March 13, 2013 16:06
External Radiation Boundary Condition (Two sided wall), Grid Interface CFD XUE FLUENT 0 July 8, 2010 06:49
Kutta condition Afungchui Main CFD Forum 5 January 28, 2005 07:02
The Boundary Condition about the Flat Plate boing Main CFD Forum 1 January 6, 2002 17:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:16.