CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

Surface tension - normal or tangential ?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   October 22, 2013, 12:28
Smile Surface tension - normal or tangential ?
  #1
New Member
 
Rams Manu
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 12
manxu is on a distinguished road
Hi,

The surface tension forces at the contact line, as per the young's equation for contact angle, is tangential to the interfaces. (see Pic1.)

But I also came across another form of equation for surface tension as shown in Pic2 from FLUENT (which is also commonly used elsewhere). Here, the surface tension forces are normal to the interface (because of the gradient of Volume fraction, alpha).

The above mentioned models quite clearly contradict each other !

How are the surface tension forces acting at the contact line ? Tangential or normal ? Are both these models equivalent ? Did I miss anything ?


Thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: png Pic1.png (17.6 KB, 34 views)
File Type: png Pic2.png (7.2 KB, 40 views)

Last edited by manxu; October 22, 2013 at 12:29. Reason: typo error
manxu is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 22, 2013, 13:32
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,756
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
parallel to the surface ... the normal direction is referred to as force for unit line, eg. see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surface_tension
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2013, 10:30
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Kieran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16
kieranhood is on a distinguished road
I'm not sure how this works at the contact line as its quite hard to visualise. But if you imagine a section of fluid-fluid interface with the surface tension acting tangential to it, at the ends of this interface. I've included a simplistic diagram for clarity here.

If it is flat, the forces cancel out there is no net force on the section. However, if it is curved there is a net force that acts normal to the interface.
kieranhood is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2013, 10:58
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,756
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by kieranhood View Post
I'm not sure how this works at the contact line as its quite hard to visualise. But if you imagine a section of fluid-fluid interface with the surface tension acting tangential to it, at the ends of this interface. I've included a simplistic diagram for clarity here.

If it is flat, the forces cancel out there is no net force on the section. However, if it is curved there is a net force that acts normal to the interface.

I think that the misleading could be due to the fact that a component of the stress tensor is associated to 2 directions...
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2013, 11:43
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Kieran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 16
kieranhood is on a distinguished road
I haven't used fluent before but by the looks of it sigma_ij is the surface tension coefficient between the fluids i and j.
kieranhood is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 23, 2013, 13:39
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Rams Manu
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 12
manxu is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by kieranhood View Post
I haven't used fluent before but by the looks of it sigma_ij is the surface tension coefficient between the fluids i and j.
Yes, sigma_ij is the surface tension coefficient. So, at the contact line, as you said, although its quite tough to visualize, atleast the values of surface tension based on these two models should match. Moreover, the fluent based model is a volumetric force whereas the young's equation based model is Force/length.

Still couldn't get a good picture of how these two models are equivalent !
manxu is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
surface tension

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Problems with coedge curves and surfaces tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 December 1, 2020 12:12
ActuatorDiskExplicitForce in OF2.1. Help be_inspired OpenFOAM Programming & Development 10 September 14, 2018 12:12
[CAD formats] my stl surface is seen as just a line rcastilla OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 2 January 6, 2010 02:30
Surface Tension Gradient Alisher FLUENT 0 March 26, 2008 05:26
CFX4.3 -build analysis form Chie Min CFX 5 July 13, 2001 00:19


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56.