|October 29, 2013, 06:41||
Thermal boundary implication (constant heat flux)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 31Rep Power: 6
I found this quota in a paper, why implementation of constant heat flux is difficult?
"For the thermal boundary condition, the temperature distribution along the pipe wall was specified, based on the data. Although a constant heat flux was applied as the thermal
boundary condition in the experiment, with the present DNS technique it is didifficult to treat a constant wall heat flux condition for spatially developing flow problems"
Thanks for your time
|October 29, 2013, 07:30||
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,307Rep Power: 28
From this statement is not clear .... as DNS is referred as, the number of grid point in the thermal BL have to be sufficient to impose a Neuman BC.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Low Mixing time Problem||Mavier||CFX||5||April 29, 2013 00:00|
|Heat Flux Profile at Fluid-Porous Interface||Hitch8||CFX||4||December 15, 2012 10:57|
|CFX doesn't continue calculation...||mactech001||CFX||6||November 15, 2009 22:25|
|Heat flux and k-e wall boundary conditions||Blob||CFX||4||June 8, 2009 05:10|
|Two-Phase Buoyant Flow Issue||Miguel Baritto||CFX||4||August 31, 2006 12:02|