CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Is this problem well posed?

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 7, 1999, 23:48
Default Is this problem well posed?
  #1
Thomas P. Abraham
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello Everyone:

I am working on a problem and wondering whether the problem I defined is well posed. I am working on a different problem. I will try to illustrate a much simpler problem. I am working on a pure conduction case.

Heat Flux

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

- -

- Aluminum Block -

- -

- -

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

h, Tambient

At one end, a constant heat flux is applied. On the other end, a convective boundary condition is applied through heat transfer coefficient, h and the ambient temperature, Tambient. I think by applying a heat flux boundary condition, I am specifying the heat transfer rate at that boundary. Even at the other end, I am specifying the heat transfer rate through the heat transfer coefficeint, h and the ambient temperature, Tambient. There is no reference temperature specified in the computational domain and hence the problem may be ill-posed.

on the contrary, if I were to specify a temperature boundary condition instead of the convective boundary condition, the problem will be well posed.

What do you all think?

Thanks for your feedbacks,

Thomas

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 1999, 06:00
Default Re: Is this problem well posed?
  #2
D.M. Lipinski
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you can provide an initial condition i.e. the temperature distribution (may be uniform) in the aluminium block, you can run the unsteady heat condution calculations. You will, say, cool the block from the top (given heat flux at the top), this will influence the temperature distribution in the block (heat conduction PLUS accumulation because of finite heat capacity of aluminium). At each time step, the temperature at the bottom of the block you will get as the result of calculations. So the rate of the heat transfer at the bottom (implemented implicitly in your calculations), at each time step, will be known as the bottom temperature of the block, ambient temperature and the heat transfer coefficient are available to the program. If the steady state condition of your problem exists, you'll reach it, after some time, by running unsteady calculations. regards DML
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 1999, 09:52
Default Re: Is this problem well posed?
  #3
Hongjun Li
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your boundary conditions are well-posted. Your Tambient will serve as your reference temperature.

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 1999, 14:29
Default Re: Is this problem well posed?
  #4
Aleksey Alekseev
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Your problem is well posed. Why did you decide that it is ill-posed? Have you some instabillity? Aleksey
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 1999, 14:43
Default Re: Is this problem well posed?
  #5
clifford bradford
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
yes your problem is well posed because the steady state heat equation (laplace's eqtn) requires two boundary conditions in ach coord direction and these can be specified temp, heat flux (equivalent to temp gradient), or convection BC (which is specified correctly as you have it). whenever you solve steady state heat transfer all you need is one of these BC on every portion of the domain boundary. if you use the time marching approach your choice of initial condition does not affect the steady state temp distribution
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 1999, 14:52
Default Re: Is this problem well posed?
  #6
Thomas P. Abraham
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks to everyone for your responses. Yes, the problem is well posed. I thought that I saw something strange yesterday to doubt the validity of my boundary conditions. What I saw was physical and I got it confirmed today.

Thanks again,

Thomas
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UDF compiling problem Wouter Fluent UDF and Scheme Programming 6 June 6, 2012 04:43
engineFoam new mesh problem ayhan515 OpenFOAM 2 May 1, 2012 04:29
Gambit - meshing over airfoil wrapping (?) problem JFDC FLUENT 1 July 11, 2011 05:59
natural convection problem for a CHT problem Se-Hee CFX 2 June 10, 2007 06:29
Adiabatic and Rotating wall (Convection problem) ParodDav CFX 5 April 29, 2007 19:13


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:34.