# Flow over FLAT-PLATE

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 September 10, 1999, 06:51 Flow over FLAT-PLATE #1 Yogesh Talekar Guest   Posts: n/a Dear "Gurus" I am trying to solve a 2-D flow over flat plat in conservation from of Navier-Stokes eqiuation using MacCormark's explicit method in finite difference. My x and y grid sizes are of the order of 10^-7. The Raynold's number is 1000. Is this grid spacing all right? The value of Delta(t) is of the order of 10^-21. But I am not getting the soluation all right. Something odd develops on alternate grids. For example.. velocities on even grids will be very HIGH (say 1200 m/s) and velocities on EVEN grids will be very LOW (say 0.0001 m/s). Can somebody help me...PLEASE Thanks YOGESH

 September 10, 1999, 08:13 Re: Flow over FLAT-PLATE #2 Jim Park Guest   Posts: n/a The symptoms you describe suggest the classic "checkerboard" instability. Check your pressure solution; does it also show a high-low alternating pattern? This sort of problem is discussed extensively in Pat Roache' s book, Computational Fluid Dynamics (a classic - 1970's), so it should be well-covered in the modern texts. Good luck!

 September 10, 1999, 08:18 What about grid spacingR #3 Yogesh Talekar Guest   Posts: n/a Sir, You have not commented on grid sapcing and delta(t).are they okey? YOGESH

 September 10, 1999, 09:39 Re: What about grid spacingR #4 Hongjun Li Guest   Posts: n/a Are you talking about the MacCormack two-step predictor-correction scheme for compressible flows? If so, you may have some coding problems. Check carefully on the two steps and make sure they are NOT on the same time-level. In this scheme, each step is 1st order, one forward and one backward, at different time level. The two together makes it 2nd order. However, if the two steps are in the same time level, it becomes a 2nd order central-differening scheme. Then you will have this kind of odd-even grid points decoupling problem due to the lack of numerical dissipation (someone call artificial viscousity). Your grid spacing may affect the accuracy but will not cause such probelm. HL

 September 21, 1999, 06:17 Actual problem #5 Yogesh Talekar Guest   Posts: n/a Sir, Actually I have misunderstood the situation. The real problem is.. The values spread tooo slowly in towards the internal grids. Suppose i have taken velocity at boundary to be 1300 m/s I find that only the points near boundary are affected and that to in a very slow manner. Really speaking.. the very internal grid points are TOTALLY unaffected! So i increased the time-step .. but then soln goes unstable. Shall i put number of iterations very high and time-step viz. Delta(t) very small? Thank you Yogesh

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Nikhil Main CFD Forum 6 May 20, 2013 12:48 varunjain89 Main CFD Forum 3 March 6, 2012 12:13 farocean97 Main CFD Forum 0 September 12, 2011 10:57 AndyLiu Main CFD Forum 1 August 7, 2006 08:02 lisa Main CFD Forum 2 August 30, 2005 16:36

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:07.