CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Flow over FLAT-PLATE

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 10, 1999, 06:51
Default Flow over FLAT-PLATE
Yogesh Talekar
Posts: n/a
Dear "Gurus"

I am trying to solve a 2-D flow over flat plat in conservation from of Navier-Stokes eqiuation using MacCormark's explicit method in finite difference.

My x and y grid sizes are of the order of 10^-7. The Raynold's number is 1000. Is this grid spacing all right? The value of Delta(t) is of the order of 10^-21.

But I am not getting the soluation all right. Something odd develops on alternate grids. For example.. velocities on even grids will be very HIGH (say 1200 m/s) and velocities on EVEN grids will be very LOW (say 0.0001 m/s).

Can somebody help me...PLEASE


  Reply With Quote

Old   September 10, 1999, 08:13
Default Re: Flow over FLAT-PLATE
Jim Park
Posts: n/a
The symptoms you describe suggest the classic "checkerboard" instability. Check your pressure solution; does it also show a high-low alternating pattern?

This sort of problem is discussed extensively in Pat Roache' s book, Computational Fluid Dynamics (a classic - 1970's), so it should be well-covered in the modern texts.

Good luck!
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 10, 1999, 08:18
Default What about grid spacingR
Yogesh Talekar
Posts: n/a

You have not commented on grid sapcing and delta(t).are they okey?

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 10, 1999, 09:39
Default Re: What about grid spacingR
Hongjun Li
Posts: n/a
Are you talking about the MacCormack two-step predictor-correction scheme for compressible flows? If so, you may have some coding problems. Check carefully on the two steps and make sure they are NOT on the same time-level. In this scheme, each step is 1st order, one forward and one backward, at different time level. The two together makes it 2nd order. However, if the two steps are in the same time level, it becomes a 2nd order central-differening scheme. Then you will have this kind of odd-even grid points decoupling problem due to the lack of numerical dissipation (someone call artificial viscousity).

Your grid spacing may affect the accuracy but will not cause such probelm.

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 21, 1999, 06:17
Default Actual problem
Yogesh Talekar
Posts: n/a

Actually I have misunderstood the situation. The real problem is.. The values spread tooo slowly in towards the internal grids. Suppose i have taken velocity at boundary to be 1300 m/s I find that only the points near boundary are affected and that to in a very slow manner.

Really speaking.. the very internal grid points are TOTALLY unaffected!

So i increased the time-step .. but then soln goes unstable. Shall i put number of iterations very high and time-step viz. Delta(t) very small?

Thank you

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supersonic flow over flat plate Nikhil Main CFD Forum 6 May 20, 2013 12:48
incompressible, 2-D laminar flow over flat plate... varunjain89 Main CFD Forum 3 March 6, 2012 12:13
HELP! Flow over both sides of a plate. farocean97 Main CFD Forum 0 September 12, 2011 10:57
Flow over flat plate using FASTRAN AndyLiu Main CFD Forum 1 August 7, 2006 08:02
results for flow past flat plate normal to flow lisa Main CFD Forum 2 August 30, 2005 16:36

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:22.