CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

velocity vectors

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By myaccount

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 18, 2013, 08:34
Default velocity vectors
  #1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 4
myaccount is on a distinguished road
Hi
I have simulated 2-D flow applying velocity inlet and pressure outlet boundary conditions.Later I applied periodic boundary conditions at inlet making the outlet conditions as shadow zone.After convergence, I see the velocity vectors coming out of the outlet zone.Why is this happening?
myaccount is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2013, 13:03
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,305
Rep Power: 22
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
Why should it not happen?
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 20, 2013, 02:21
Default
  #3
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 4
myaccount is on a distinguished road
Thank you for the question that made me to think.I was initially in an impression that all the vectors will be represented in the closed domain.I came to that they need not be .
I have another problem now.
Iam simulating the flow over solids(squares).For this, I created a domain(big rectangle) with solids squares inside.I gave velocity inlet boundary condition at the entrance and pressure outlet at the exit.I have meshed it and transferred to fluent.I have applied periodic boundary conditions at the inlet making the outlet shadow. I have run the case for different grids with convergence criterion of 10-6.As I refine the grid the the curve goes flatter.Why is this happening? Which value is to be taken for further analysis?please find attached a pic of the grid independent study result.
Attached Files
File Type: docx grid independent study.docx (28.2 KB, 5 views)
flotus1 likes this.
myaccount is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 20, 2013, 05:42
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,305
Rep Power: 22
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
I have no idea which values you put into this figure, so it is impossible to comment on the results.
And please, attach figures in a file format that everybody can read without much effort, something like .png or .jpg would be nice.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 20, 2013, 10:31
Default Grid independent study
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 53
Rep Power: 4
myaccount is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the response.
Please find the following files attached
1.Model with boundary conditions with out mesh
2.Model after mesh generation


a.After mesh generation ,mesh is transferred to FLUENT.
b.Periodic boundary conditions are applied at inlet making the outlet shadow.Convergence criterion is kept at 10-6.
c.After convergence,a vertical rake exactly at the center of the model is created .Velocity magnitude along the rake is exported to excel sheet.
Then the mesh is refined and send to FLUENT and steps (b) and (c) are repeated.I have done this with many(6) times.The velocity magnitude curves go flatter with refinement. If I change my convergence criterion to 10-7,all curves coincide how coarser or how finer I change my grid.
What convergence should I take? Which curve value should I take for my study?
I am confused.Why is this happening?

Sorry,I could'nt send the pics in the format which you mentioned.
Thank you
Attached Files
File Type: docx Model with out mesh.docx (21.3 KB, 5 views)
File Type: docx Model after mesh generation.docx (21.1 KB, 4 views)
myaccount is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 20, 2013, 13:01
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,305
Rep Power: 22
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
If the curves change as you lower the convergence criteria, the solution can not be considered converged.
Instead of comparing the errors introduced by coarse meshes, you compare the errors from insufficient iterations.

My tip for steady-state simulations in an academic context: Run the case until the residuals level out.
Then you can compare the errors caused by the discretization or any other influence you want to investigate.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
problem with velocity magnitude and vectors Hayder Mohammed FLUENT 0 August 7, 2013 03:08
I need help about velocity vectors direction in cylinder modeling!!! aminepoxnet FLUENT 0 March 17, 2013 18:41
Inaccurate velocity vectors Arun Prasad FLUENT 4 August 2, 2012 00:43
how to display a clear vectors of velocity clauss FLUENT 1 October 24, 2006 07:30
Velocity vectors clipping Vidya FLUENT 0 July 31, 2006 21:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:10.