
[Sponsors] 
January 26, 2007, 17:13 
Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressible NS

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Hey all,
I am just curious as to how one would develop an implicit solver for the incompressible NavierStokes equations, with finite differences to handle the spatial derivatives. I am quite familiar with methods for ODEs (like backward Euler, AdamsBashford/AdamsMoulton, BDFs, RKs, etc.). I have also seen the usual explicit Eulerian approach to solving NS, which differs from how one would solve an ODE. I am talking about the explicit method presented by Griebel, Dornseifer, Neunhoeffer in their book "Numerical Simulation in Fluid Dynamics". They way they describe it, one would take a forwardEuler step, and then solve the Poisson equation for pressure to make the system divergencefree. I can't seem to find any decent explanations of how NS is solved with implicit methods, or with higherorder methods. I can think of two ways, but haven't been able to find info on either one of them. Either there is a way to reduce NS to an ODE, or there are special methods (like the explicit one by Griebel et al.) that only work with NS. So, am I missing something? Can someone point me to some info? Thanks. Dave 

January 27, 2007, 21:19 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

You need to look into solving differentialalgebraic equations. The constraint equation for strictly incompressible fluids makes the DAE system index2. If you are not strictly incompressible then you need to determine the proper constraint manifold. Once you've done this, go to the book
http://www.amazon.com/SolvingOrdina...e=UTF8&s=books Always ask yourself what is the physical basis for the constraint manifold and am I enforcing it. The derivation of the constraint manifold for nonisothermal flows is a mess. 

January 28, 2007, 01:45 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thanks. I had seen that the incompressible NavierStokes equations could be represented as a DAE. However, I was under the impression that it was really just a nonlinear PDE. Certainly, all of the textbooks on CFD that I have seen spend a chapter or two on ODE solvers, but not DAE solvers. However, I haven't seen a form of NS that I can just feed to an ODE solver.
So, if the *incompresible* version of the NavierStokes equations are an index2 DAE, then (as far as I know) the only way to solve them numerically would be to reduce it to an index1 DAE or to a pure ODE. So before I buy your recommended text and bone up on my DAE solvers, I'd like to know which is it? In either case, I presume there is literature that does the reduction for me. Could you point me to such literature? 

January 28, 2007, 06:39 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

could you please give some information about concept "index" of PDE? (pls don't refer me to any paper or book, i only need overal veiw)
i see it only in methematical literature. 

January 28, 2007, 13:47 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I believe the claim that Mr. Runge_Kutta made was that NavierStokes is a DAE, rather than a PDE (or at least, it's both). If it is a DAE, then index2 makes sense. Though, as far as I know, there is no concept of an index for a PDE. For more info on what the index of a DAE is, have a look at section 2 of this guy:
http://se.wtb.tue.nl/~vanbeek/pub/mcmds01.pdf I know that you don't want a paper, but that section is quite short an explains things better than I could in a raw text posting. 

January 28, 2007, 19:07 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

The strictly incompressible (isothermal) NSEs are what are called partial differential algebraic equations (PDAEs). Once you discretize space with finite {difference,volume,element} methods, you then have a system of DAEs. First off, this stuff is very complicated and very mathematical.
In DAEs, there are several different definitions for the index. One is the differential index and other is the perturbation index. They are measures of the sensitivity of the solution to perturbations introduced into the differential and algebraic equations. Higher index values imply a more difficult problem to solve. The isothermal NSEs are index2. You can differentiate the constraint equation w.r.t. time and derive a new constraint equation. For the isothermal NSE, differentiate Div(u)=0 with the material derivative. You get the dilatation transport equation. This is related to the index1 version of the NSE. Substitute in the index2 constraint, Div(u)=0, and you get the pressure Poisson equation. This is called index reduction and it can lead to some pathological behavior because you are enforcing the derivative of the constraint but not the constraint. I haven't mentioned the nastiest problem. When you have variable temperature, species, and chemical reactions, what is the exact form of the constraint manifold. This manifold is the one that suppresses acoustics. If you do not know the correct form of this manifold then what are you doing?? If you aren't suppressing the "fast time scale," why solve DAEs?? Also, the DAE system does nothing towards the diffusive and reactive terms. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=...r=&btnG=Search 

January 29, 2007, 06:43 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

The NavierStokes equations are a parabolic PDE which is all you need to really know. The best place to find out how to solve the NavierStokes equations using finite differences is probably the book by Ferziger & Peric  there's quite a detailed discussion and some example codes which can be downloaded from Springer's website.
Basically there are a number of ways to solve the incompressible NavierStokes equations. One possible method is the "Jacobian Free Krylov Method". This method entails discretizing the equations in space and time and iterating at each timestep to obtain a solution of the nonlinear algebraic system. This method is relatively easy to understand  you have a system of nonlinear algebraic equations obtained by discretizing the equations which you solve iteratively (no pressure projection). More common methods seggragate the equations to form an iterative scheme; e.g. (1) Estimate an increment to get the velocity at timelevel n+1 using the momentum equation (minus the pressure term). (2) Project (Hodge decomposition) the result to obtain an increment to the velocity which ensures that the new velocity field is divergence free. (3) repeat until converged. Have a look at these lecture notes http://www.math.rug.nl/~veldman/Coll...ictaat2006.pdf 

January 29, 2007, 10:06 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#8 
Guest
Posts: n/a

>The isothermal NSEs are index2
i think that, say that NS eq. is index2 is not correct!  NS is PDAE, index with respect to whose variable?  index of PDAE is function of initial and boundary conditions, so withouth especification of them index is not known.  NS is nonlinear and classic analysis are (based on my knowledge) is limitted to linear/quasilinear systems. is it? 

January 29, 2007, 10:13 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#9 
Guest
Posts: n/a

 if u look for spatially high oreder implicit, it is very simple, refer to compact high order methods for convectiondiffusion and poisson eq., and use Projection or unsteadysimple, unsteadysimpler, PISO method for pressurevel coupling (PISO has higher order time accuracy too)
 but high order (arbitrary) implicit temporal direction is difficult, i don't knowe why this thread streched to index analysis (math not CFD). Index analysis of DAE is difficul, for PDAE it is more difficult, for nonlinear PDAE is very difficult and usually analysis are limited to linear and quasilinear systems, while NS is nonlinear PDAE. Also i don't think after such complex and tedious analysis you find desired high order implicit method (es. arbitrary order as for explicit RK).  also i think that the pressent methods such as streamlinevorticity, projection methods are nothing else results of index reduction. so my advice: don't put yours in such ambiguos trade (i have simpler cure). But if you are interested (i face such analysis in derivation of continous adjoint of NS eq.) i recommend L. Petzold's book and Barton's papers (SIAM J SC, give u good look, i have PDF, if u need notify) But, why high order implicit in time? i see some physical barier to this (due to temporalparabolic nature) that give this guide that if you derive such method it can be very nonlinear, stiff and illposed. Probably aim of high order implicit in time is beter temporal accuracy (ok), so as cure: 1) decrease temporal step size and use avalible tools. 2) use present method with posteriori error estimation and adaptation, i guide you to seris of work in "Heidelberg University" and their opensource tool (Deal II library, very powerfull), they also publish a book, they present methods for high order solution of PDE and estimation of general functional. Also another work that i knowe is supraconvergent method with adjoint error recovery due to Giles and Pierce (SIAM Rev). 

January 29, 2007, 11:07 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#10 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Maybe i'm not so addicted to math and CFD as other people here but i think that the simpler way (pedagogical) to obtain an implicit, 2° order in time, scheme for the N.S. equations is the fractional step method.
That is, the intermediate velocity field(V*) is decomposed in a divergencefree part (V(n+1)) and a curlfree part (Nabla(Phi)). Obviously the curlfree part is NOT the gradient of the pressure field (this is true only for firstorder in time). Once made such a decomposition, discretize the conv.term explicitly, the diff. term implicitly (it is the first source of instabilities) and integrate with AdamBashfort. In this way you don't need to handle nonlinearities implicitly, you have a 2° order scheme and a much more wide region of stability than in a 2° order fully explicit scheme. 

January 29, 2007, 11:13 
Re: Implicit, highorder methods for Incompressibl

#11 
Guest
Posts: n/a

I'm sorry, of course i mean the projection method, not the fractional step.


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Second order upwind is not UPwind!!!  Far  CFX  9  May 31, 2011 08:21 
High order elements  pankos  Main CFD Forum  1  February 1, 2011 09:56 
High order FVM scheme ....  cfd_newbie  FLUENT  0  February 4, 2008 14:43 
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM  kenn  Main CFD Forum  2  July 18, 2004 18:28 
ONLINE: literature on IMPLICIT FINITE DIFFERENCE METHODS  Yogesh Talekar  Main CFD Forum  3  July 28, 1999 09:54 