airfoil boundary condition

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 February 4, 2007, 08:46 airfoil boundary condition #1 Bounecer Guest   Posts: n/a I have written a Fortran program to simulate flow around airfoil: My problem is: Determination of separation on naca airfoil at low Reynolds numbers (1e3 to 1e5) Flow caracteristics: * Steady, 2D * Incompressible, viscous and Laminar Mathematical model: * Continuity equation * 2 momentum equations Discretization method: * Structured C-grid generated by "mesh pilot" software * the farfield boundary is 15xcord * transformation of model from physical (x, y) to computational domain (ksi, eta) * Finte volumes discretization * Staggered grid for velocity and pressure * Simpler Algorithm * Second order Upwind scheem for convective terms and central differences for diffusive terms Solution of Algebraic equations: * Sweeping * Thomas Algrithm (TDMA) My program diverges after about 5000 itterations althought i've used low relaxation parameters: relaxation for velocity 4e-1 and for pressure 1e-1. Is that because i've not well imposed boundary conditions or because of other problems?

 February 5, 2007, 10:08 Re: airfoil boundary condition #2 ag Guest   Posts: n/a At those Reynolds numbers, the flow is going to separate very soon after the maximum thickness. The wake flow will be unsteady. I don't have a clue why your solver is diverging - it could be anything from a boundary condition to a coding error to the phase of the moon. But I would definitely consider using an unsteady solver for the problem you are seeking to simulate.

 February 5, 2007, 23:11 Re: airfoil boundary condition #3 Ahmed Guest   Posts: n/a Discretization method: * Structured C-grid generated by "mesh pilot" software * the farfield boundary is 15xcord * transformation of model from physical (x, y) to computational domain (ksi, eta) * Finte volumes discretization * The book by Blazek is an excellent reference about the Finite volume method, thereis no need to transform from physical to computational domains, the finite volume method works directly with the physical domain, I guess you have mixed up different concepts in your code, check the book, it has a CD with fortran code hope that will help

 February 7, 2007, 08:30 Re: airfoil boundary condition #4 Bounecer Guest   Posts: n/a I have set the following boundary conditions: on airfoil (low side of comput domain): u=v=0 farfield (upper side of comput domain): u=1, v=0 inflow (left side):du/dksi=dv/dksi=0 outflow (right side): du/dksi=dv/dksi=0 u(ksi, eta) and v(ksi,eta) the compnents of velocity. Is that the correct way to set boundary conditions?

 February 7, 2007, 09:55 Re: airfoil boundary condition #5 ag Guest   Posts: n/a What are you doing with pressure on the boundary?

 February 8, 2007, 11:06 Re: airfoil boundary condition #6 bounecer Guest   Posts: n/a I'm using SIMPLER Algorithm which allow to find pressure from velocity

June 28, 2010, 09:24
#7
Senior Member

Morteza
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Iran,Islamic Republic of
Posts: 159
Rep Power: 7
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Bounecer ;47729 I have written a Fortran program to simulate flow around airfoil: My problem is: Determination of separation on naca airfoil at low Reynolds numbers (1e3 to 1e5) Flow caracteristics: * Steady, 2D * Incompressible, viscous and Laminar Mathematical model: * Continuity equation * 2 momentum equations Discretization method: * Structured C-grid generated by "mesh pilot" software * the farfield boundary is 15xcord * transformation of model from physical (x, y) to computational domain (ksi, eta) * Finte volumes discretization * Staggered grid for velocity and pressure * Simpler Algorithm * Second order Upwind scheem for convective terms and central differences for diffusive terms Solution of Algebraic equations: * Sweeping * Thomas Algrithm (TDMA) My program diverges after about 5000 itterations althought i've used low relaxation parameters: relaxation for velocity 4e-1 and for pressure 1e-1. Is that because i've not well imposed boundary conditions or because of other problems?

hi i am an aerospace engineer....i have to simulate the flow over an airfoil, i have to write a code and i have not enough time to do that...
i prefer spending my time on a pre-written code and try to modify it for my purpose..

thanks

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Saturn CFX 34 October 16, 2014 05:27 smn CFX 5 November 24, 2009 07:37 Pankaj CFX 9 November 23, 2009 05:05 gameoverli OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 1 May 21, 2009 08:28 HervĂ© CFX 2 June 16, 2008 06:40

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:03.