|February 6, 2007, 00:36||
Stability Condition for Immersed Boundary Method
I have a very naive forward-Euler implementation of the Peskin's immersed boundary (IB) method. I would like to be able to use adaptive time steps with this system. However, the standard Courant stability condition seems to over-estimate the step size that I can use. This makes sense, since apparently the IB formulation is much more stiff than regular grid-based Navier-Stokes solvers.
So, I'm trying to find information about what kind of stability condition to use. I have looked around the research literature, and found a lot of info about how certain time-stepping schemes are better than others, and plots of the stability regions, etc. However, I haven't seen a formula (like the Courant condition) for computing an acceptable step size.
So, can anyone nudge me in the right direction?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Wind turbine simulation||Saturn||CFX||45||February 8, 2016 05:42|
|vorticity boundary condition||bearcharge||Main CFD Forum||0||May 14, 2010 11:32|
|problem with boundary condition???||smn||CFX||5||November 24, 2009 07:37|
|RPM in Wind Turbine||Pankaj||CFX||9||November 23, 2009 05:05|
|how to set up a wall boundary condition according to calculated wall shear stress?||gameoverli||OpenFOAM Pre-Processing||1||May 21, 2009 08:28|