CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

VSAERO and UAV

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By blackjack

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 23, 2007, 16:57
Default VSAERO and UAV
  #1
berg
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I have read a lot of paper using VSAERO for UAV and other CFD related work. It seems a very good software. Can anyone confirm? Is it easy to use?

http://www.am-inc.com/

http://www.aerohydro.com/products/marine/navatek.htm

http://www.uavnet.com/DL/Document_Li...ions_Index.htm www.dglr.de/veranstaltungen/extern/aerodays2006/sessions/E_Sessions/E3/E31.pdf

Berg
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2007, 05:18
Default Re: VSAERO and UAV
  #2
Al
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear Berg, I am using VSAERO since quite a while. I wouldn't say it's a very good software. It works fine for a very limited number of applications. If you want to get drag prediction, forget it (this is true also for almost every cfd software tough!). If you want to use it for hi subsonic mach numbers, forget it. It is relatively easy to use, but you need a lot of experience for the paneling. It's a really old software and it's not user friendly.

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 1, 2011, 01:50
Default
  #3
New Member
 
james nathman
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 6
blackjack is on a distinguished road
VSAERO's not dead yet.

Imagine doing CFD on a black & white terminal that could only plot wire frames and velocity vectors. User-friendly just wasn't possible when the first version of VSAERO was released. The current version (2009) is 7.5. Al's remarks are correct for 20 years ago, but...

In 2004, Gridgen started supporting hybrid VSAERO, so paneling is up to date. Hybrid VSAERO accepts unstructured triangular meshes that simplify meshing wing/body fillets and other odd shapes. The structured quadrilateral meshes were revised by eliminating the assumption of flat panels.

Trefftz-plane drag calculations are available for induced drag.

Al (is that you Alberto B.?) have you seen Spin, the graphical preprocessor and Omni3d (not omniplot!), the results processor? MSTOP=25 is a great way of evaluating the quality of a grid before doing computation. The matrix solvers now dynamically allocate memory so 30,000 panels are routine (compared to 3000 panels in version 4).

Not to mention the huge number of bugs corrected, including off-body, near-field velocities.
PierluigiRossi likes this.
blackjack is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 12, 2013, 16:09
Default Request
  #4
New Member
 
Farrukh Mazhar
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 3
farrukhmazhar@gmail.com is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al
;48125
Dear Berg, I am using VSAERO since quite a while. I wouldn't say it's a very good software. It works fine for a very limited number of applications. If you want to get drag prediction, forget it (this is true also for almost every cfd software tough!). If you want to use it for hi subsonic mach numbers, forget it. It is relatively easy to use, but you need a lot of experience for the paneling. It's a really old software and it's not user friendly.
Can you please provide me the VSAERO compiler.
farrukhmazhar@gmail.com is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:23.