# Divergence problem when airfoil exceed pitch angle

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 March 11, 2007, 01:25 Divergence problem when airfoil exceed pitch angle #1 zonexo Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I've got a 2D FVM fractional step structured solver. It's used to simulate moving (oscillating, pitching) airfoil with grid deformation. Arc based TFI is used for the deforming of grids. It works well for pitch angle up to ~20deg. However, at higher angles or highly cambered airfoil, the results starts to diverge and the simulation has to be stopped. This divergence usually occur near the leading edge of the airfoil. I've inspected the grid. It's deformed but it still seems ok (i guess). I wonder what can be done to prevent this from happening. Here's what I'm considering: 1. decrease time step 2. increase time step (avoid the high angle?) 3. increase grid no. 4. change deformation algorithm - suggestions? I've done some initial testing but it's not too good. I wonder if there's other mtds available? Thank you

 March 12, 2007, 08:54 Re: Divergence problem when airfoil exceed pitch a #2 Mani Guest   Posts: n/a Before you jump into costly resolution studies I would try to diagnose the problem a little more. You say the grid looks ok even at the highest angle. Have you tried using this deformed grid to get a (quasi-) steady state solution at the high angle? This isn't a sufficient or even necessary condition for success, but it will help you sort out the effect of unsteadiness. In particular, you should take a look at the effect of the reduced frequency (choose a very small frequency of motion to get a quasi-steady solution, i.e. a solution that depends only on temporal angle of attack but not on rotational velocity of the airfoil). And then, there's another revolutionary idea (wink): Look at the unsteady flow field (snap shots, movie) until the point when it starts to diverge. Also look at the unsteady pressure distribution. Do you see anything that stands out as a potential problem? Furthermore, I would take out number 2 in your list of remedies as a very, very questionable (and probably useless) approach.

 April 4, 2007, 04:22 Nice site #3 Valintino Guest   Posts: n/a Hello, Your site is great. Regards, Valintino Guxxi

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post creggie ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 10 June 27, 2010 19:24 Frank Main CFD Forum 1 April 21, 2008 18:36 cfd_newbie FLUENT 10 February 5, 2008 12:33 zonexo Main CFD Forum 1 May 27, 2006 15:16 ganesh Main CFD Forum 2 June 27, 2005 13:57

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 17:30.