CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

FVM vs FEM

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 26, 2007, 02:55
Default FVM vs FEM
  #1
elwolv
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
looking for books on CFD using FVM, I found only few available.

in most discussions for CFD, FVM is as capable for handling problems with curved geometry and unstructured grid

however, it seems all academic courses are geared for FEM and all books are on FEM, and most simulations performed with packages using FEM.

Q: my interest is in microfluidic simulation, does that means that FVM is no longer a viable solution to use and only FEM should be the one method to use?

thank you for guidance on that.

elwolv

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2007, 09:16
Default Re: FVM vs FEM
  #2
otd
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
"does that means that FVM is no longer a viable solution to use and only FEM should be the one method to use?"

No
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 26, 2007, 11:18
Default Re: FVM vs FEM
  #3
elwolv
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
tank you for response

i found that FVM is used in microfluidic simulation, example problem at the web site of prof Nenes : nenes.eas.gatech.edu/cfd

however, a review article "toward numerical prottyping of lab-n-chi:..." by David Erickson, microfluid nanofluid (2005) 1:301-318, states in page 302: that FV methods are best suited for problems where viscous terms a absent as opposed to the low Re flows encountered in microfluidic in which these terms are dominant!

Q: how do you interpret the results of prof Nenes example if the should not be used for such scale problem?

Q: just because of viscosity we should not use FVM in a microfluidic simulation?

thank you
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2007, 01:05
Default Re: FVM vs FEM
  #4
rt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
FVM vs. FEM is an old question that usually appeared in this forum, but it is very difficult to compare FVM vs. FEM from accuracy and capability veiwpoints because there are several version of FEM and FVM that can compete with each other. Also under some condition FEM is equivalent with FVM e.g. see these papers:

http://www.ann.jussieu.fr/~vohralik/...ub_CRAS_04.pdf http://www.iam.fmph.uniba.sk/amuc/_c...5/vohralik.pdf

in my opinion there is not any limitation for either FVM or FEM for simulation of various kind of fluid but roughly it can be said that FEM is more easy to programming and implementation (especially for multiphysics phenomena) but more memory and CPU expensive.

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2007, 00:34
Default Re: FVM vs FEM
  #5
elwolv
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thank you for your response - RT

1- I understand that FEM is the most popular in commercial pkgs, and it is easier to program, I thought that FVM is easier.

2- my comment regarding the articles indicating that FVM is for viscosity=0, while my interest in microfluidic is viscous in nature for low Re <1 and <10.

Q: can we consider FEM is method of choice to program curved path for simulation? and the viscosity question becomes irrelevant.

Q: why simpler FDM is not used for micro-simulation? which FDM is more accurate/appropriate for micro-simulation, low Re and viscous effect?

thank you for your responses

elwolv
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2007, 15:33
Default Re: FVM vs FEM
  #6
rt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
>Q: can we consider FEM is method of choice to program >curved path for simulation?

what you mean from curved path?

>and the viscosity question becomes irrelevant.

resolution of viscosity effect in low Renold numbers (as you have 1-10) is simple and i think doesn't made concerrn for you, without attention to FVM, FEM or FDM

>Q: why simpler FDM is not used for micro-simulation?

probably due to limitation to capturing curved bc, or multi-physics simulation or elegance

>which FDM is more accurate/appropriate for micro >simulation, low Re and viscous effect?

i don't konw what is important in your simulation, but based on your requirement (and required LOD) you should select method

for solution of FDM problem related to curved boundaries several methods under concept of cut-cell or immersed boundary are suggested, also sometimes quadtree/octree refinement is included. But they are not usually suitable for viscose simulation.

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2007, 23:12
Default Re: FVM vs FEM
  #7
elwolv
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thank you for your response.

curved path is is the flow micro-channel form a non straight pathway to allow constant flow for long distance in small space, called serpentine. the dimensions are in the range of 100-500 micron.

elwolv

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2007, 13:23
Default Re: FVM vs FEM
  #8
Sandeep
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
IntelliSense has a FVM/VOF based commercial microfluidic simulator. One of the nice things about VOF is when dealing with Fluid Structure Interaction you do not have to constantly regrid/remesh. Another advantage is the computational time is significantly less than FEM due to small matrix sizes.

-Sandeep
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2007, 13:23
Default Re: FVM vs FEM
  #9
Sandeep
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Here's a link to the webpage

<http://intellisensesoftware.com/modu...ofluidics.html>

-S
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3D interpolation: From FVM to FEM nodes and back vasilis Main CFD Forum 2 October 15, 2008 03:33
FEM vs FVM flex Main CFD Forum 8 March 27, 2007 06:24
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM kenn Main CFD Forum 2 July 18, 2004 18:28
FEM v FVM thomas o brien FLUENT 0 November 21, 2001 11:27
FEM or FVM for CFD Astrid Main CFD Forum 18 December 15, 2000 01:02


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:39.