|
[Sponsors] |
May 28, 2007, 20:14 |
stochastic & CFD
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I saw a presentation slide somewhere stating that for highly non-linear solid structural analysis, it has been suggested that deterministic approach is not suitable and a "stochastic" is the RIGHT option. I wonder if the same is true for fluid flows or CFD. Any comment or can someone elaborate on what is meant by non-deterministic approach for CFD?
|
|
May 29, 2007, 00:05 |
Re: stochastic & CFD
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I think a stoic approach would be best.
Maybe what they're saying is that a transient simulation is appropriate because no stable solution exists. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 21:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 04:49 |
Since Last June | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 12, 1999 09:38 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |
CFD Symposium (Call for Papers) | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | October 5, 1998 10:25 |