CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

compssible vs. incompressible

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 29, 2007, 04:07
Default compssible vs. incompressible
  #1
qunwuhe@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
what is the consequence of using compssible method to simulate incompressible flow, like flow in pipe.

It is possible to achieve the generally accepatable results?

thanks a lot
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2007, 05:19
Default Re: compssible vs. incompressible
  #2
andy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
> It is possible to achieve the generally accepatable results?

It depends on the details of the particular compressible scheme.

No compressible scheme will be as efficient as a properly sorted incompressible scheme but there are a small number that are designed to work at low Mach numbers. Of these, most distort and dissipate the acoustics waves by design since this is what causes problems for compressible flow with only a small number attempting to simulate accurate acoustic waves at a non-negligible computational cost.

At zero Mach number (i.e. purely incompressible flow) the compressible flow equations do not really hold although it is not particularly difficult to arrange things so that a compressible code becomes an incompressible code in the limit.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2007, 06:05
Default Re: compssible vs. incompressible
  #3
rt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
at first there is not any fully-incompressible media in universe, because sound speed is not infinite in any media but incompressible modelling is an assumption.

generally any incompressible assumed flow is a compreesible flow in fact, but with larger sound speed, so theoritically you can use any compressible code for simulation of such flow but computational efficiency may be a serious issue.
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2007, 08:22
Default Re: compssible vs. incompressible
  #4
qunwuhe@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why the computation efficiency is a problem? Should we use much more grid or much smaller time step?

  Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2007, 10:16
Default Re: compssible vs. incompressible
  #5
rt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
usually time step limitation is issue
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2007, 10:28
Default Re: compssible vs. incompressible
  #6
Jake
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The issue with using a compressible code to solve an incompressible (or very low Mach number) problem is very slow convergence. The problem is that the equations become very "stiff" in the sense that the magnitude of the eigenvalues becomes very far apart. The maximum timestep is typically limited by the fastest moving wave. Since the pressure wave moves with the sound speed and the sound speed is very high, the timestep needs to be very low. A preconditioner can be used to bring the eigenvalues closer together for low Mach numbers, thus improving the convergence and the accuracy. But I believe there is a limit to how well they work at very low Mach numbers (<0.01)
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2007, 11:58
Default Re: compssible vs. incompressible
  #7
qunwuhe
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
thanks a lot. He
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2007, 12:54
Default Re: compssible vs. incompressible
  #8
rt
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
dealing with unsteady flow, using compressible code can be computationally tractable, althouth time step is limited but we can use explicite time stepping and so have a fully explicite solver, it is very interesting dealing with large scale problems when solution of system of eq. is difficult, parallel efficiency and scalability of fully explicit methods is surly better than implicit ones.

with looking in literature there several (all speed) compressible solvers that are presented for solution of incompressible flow (artificial compressibility approach)
  Reply With Quote

Old   May 29, 2007, 14:22
Default Re: compssible vs. incompressible
  #9
Jake
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The artificial compressibility approach is valid only for incompressible flows. I'm not sure I understand what you mean in your last sentence.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Incompressible turbulence models: strange implementations? AleDR OpenFOAM 3 November 18, 2014 11:23
Hardware selection for steady/unsteady incompressible, turbulent and cht simulations maddalena OpenFOAM 2 July 13, 2011 08:55
Incompressible Ideal gas law Leverkin FLUENT 5 March 5, 2009 16:41
Abt: the speed of sound in incompressible flows jinwon park Main CFD Forum 3 August 21, 2008 20:44
Compressible vs. Incompressible formulations Fernando Velasco Hurtado Main CFD Forum 3 January 7, 2000 16:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:18.