|June 18, 2007, 13:06||
Question abt Overset & ALE
I have some question regarding Overset & ALE (Arbitrary Lagrangianâ€"Eulerian).
If one needs to simulate a cylinder moving in a fluid, he can use the ALE formulation of the NS eqns to move or deform the whole grid to acheive this.
If he's using overset, where there are now 2 grids - one for cylinder, usually structured and one for background, usually cartesian, what and how should the eqns be solved? Is it the ALE formualation for the cylinder grid, ie with a moving mesh velocity (same as above), and the original non-ALE formulation for the background stationary carteisn grid?
Will there be problems at the interface of the 2 grids since they'r using differnt formulations?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Unanswered question||niklas||OpenFOAM||2||July 31, 2013 17:03|
|A general question on solving NS equations with an ALE description||Hooman||Main CFD Forum||4||September 5, 2011 19:47|
|OpenFOAM-1.6 install cookbook||MadsR||OpenFOAM Installation||372||November 20, 2010 12:57|
|A question about dynamic overset grids||JXIA||Main CFD Forum||4||January 10, 2008 04:50|
|Question abt. the Riemann analytic solver||jinwon||Main CFD Forum||0||July 16, 2007 15:11|