
[Sponsors] 
June 20, 2007, 09:41 
What on earth is the criteria for the compressible

#1 
Guest
Posts: n/a

What on earth is the criteria for the compressible fluid flow , Ma>0.3 or Ma>1 ?
When Ma>0.3, the fluid flow is considered as compressible. However, for the flow over a twodimensional flat plate at Ma=0.5, the calculation of boundary layer thickness is about the same as the theory value for uncompressible case. Why? After looking through some books ,such as F.M. White's Viscous Fluid Flow, H.Sclichting's BoundaryLayer Theory , what they mentioned the compressible fluid flow seems refer to the cases of Ma>1. So, it comes to the conclusion that when Ma>1, we ,in practice, use the theory for the compressible case . Is this right, Sir? 

June 20, 2007, 12:09 
Re: What on earth is the criteria for the compress

#2 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Another rule of thumb of the measure of incompressibility is the change of density.If it lies within a certain range then flow can be assumed incompressible.Further as long as the incompressible code is able to capture the physics even if it slightly into the compressible regime it would be fine.


June 21, 2007, 10:14 
Re: What on earth is the criteria for the compress

#3 
Guest
Posts: n/a

>Another rule of thumb of the measure of incompressibility is the change of density.
Not to increase the present confusion: Let's be more precise. a) Compressibility is the ability of density to change due to pressure changes. Mathematically, the derivative of density with respect to pressure is a measure for compressibility. (Density can also change because of temperature changes, which has nothing to do with compressibility.) b) The above not a "rule of thumb", it's the definition of compressibility. Here's the rule of thumb. The density on the surface of an airfoil (or any other object) will vary between the absolute minimum (the density at the point of highest local Mach number) and the absolute maxmimum (stagnation density). The ratio of stagnation density to local static density is a function of local Mach number, for ideal gases. For air as an ideal gas (ratio of specific heats = 1.4), the stagnation density is about 5% higher than the static density at a Mach number of 0.3. Hence, if the maximum Mach number on the surface of an airfoil is 0.3, the density in the entire flow field will vary by no more than 5%, which is relatively small. This is the reason why Mach 0.3 is generally considered as upper limit for "incompressible" flow. For any Mach number above that, you will expect larger variations of density. You'll notice that this rule of thumb is based on the variation of density within a flow field. This isn't exactly the definition of compressibility as stated above (hence, "rule of thumb"). Notice also, that it is the *local* maximum Mach number that matters, not the freestream value! At the same freestream Mach number, compressibility will be much more apparent on a thick airfoil than on a flat plate. With a flat plate in subsonic flow, the highest Mach number occurs very locally at the leading edge and that is a singular point, anyway! I guess you'll see the complications of "rules of thumb". You may use them as you wish, but understand and keep in mind where they come from. 

June 22, 2007, 04:12 
Re: What on earth is the criteria for the compress

#4 
Guest
Posts: n/a

1 Incompressibility hypothesis is not a physical one, IT IS an engineering design hypothesis 2 As posted before, Engineers in their designs neglect changes in density as a result of pressure changes when they are less than 3% (Which corresponds to Mach =0.3 for air flows)(Check The derivation in Anderson Book) 3 It is up to you to decide whether this hypothesis is valid in your design/research or not


June 22, 2007, 07:16 
Re: What on earth is the criteria for the compress

#5 
Guest
Posts: n/a

To introduce more confusion  sometimes (e.g. high lift multielement airfoils) you can have a significant change of density even at Ma<0.3. And for some applications like aeroacustics even very small density changes have to be accounted for, which can be observed even at nearly zero Mach numbers.


June 22, 2007, 08:44 
Re: What on earth is the criteria for the compress

#6 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thanks Harish for
"as long as the incompressible code is able to capture the physics " 

June 22, 2007, 08:47 
Re: What on earth is the criteria for the compress

#7 
Guest
Posts: n/a

Thanks Mani for "I guess you'll see the complications of "rules of thumb". You may use them as you wish, but understand and keep in mind where they come from. "


Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Compressible > incompressible.  Jinwon  Main CFD Forum  6  November 23, 2007 22:07 
How can I set the converge criteria properly?  Alina  FLUENT  3  September 7, 2007 17:55 
compressible gas problem  hx  CFX  1  January 5, 2004 03:00 
PHI file structure  Eugene  Phoenics  9  November 2, 2001 23:00 
Compressible vs. Incompressible formulations  Fernando Velasco Hurtado  Main CFD Forum  3  January 7, 2000 17:51 