CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

CLF criteria: Physical significance

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 7, 1999, 07:00
Default CLF criteria: Physical significance
Yogesh Talekar
Posts: n/a

what is the physical significance of CFL criteria?

Does the CFL criterian takes care of the number of grid points on which the solution at a single grid point depends at a particular "time-level". IF yes then HOW?

Does the CFL criterian means that "as you proceed in time-domain .. . the number of grid points on which a solution at a particular grid-point depends, increases"

Thanks in advance

  Reply With Quote

Old   October 7, 1999, 11:08
Default Re: CFL criteria: Physical significance
clifford Bradford
Posts: n/a
the CFL number is defined as v*deltat/deltax where v is the speed of a disturbance or some characteristic speed in the flow, deltat is the time step and deltax is the grid size. the CFL number is the ratio of the distance travelled by the disturbance moving at speed v in time deltat to the grid spacing. for a given analysis the CFL number controls the size of your timestep relative to your grid size. your timestep should be small enough to allow a disturbance moving at speed v to be captured in your spatial stencil. your understanding of the concept is adequate but it'd be better to read up on the CFL number in a CFD text like John Anderson's Intro to CFD or Tannehill,Anderson and Pletcher's CFD book
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 7, 1999, 15:31
Default Re: CFL criteria: Physical significance
Patrick Godon
Posts: n/a
In simple physical terms, the CFL (Courant Friedrich Levi) conditions makes sure that the speed of the numerical integration is larger than any speed in the flow. So that as information propagates in the flow, the integration can follow it (otherwise the info goes faster than the integration and it is lost). The info for example might be just the sound waves over a flow moving with a velocity v. So if v is the velocity of the flow and c is the sound velocity, usually one wants

the time step dt to be smaller than dx/(c+v),

where dx is the grid spacing and v denotes the absolute value of the velocity of the flow. This is then equivalent to saying that

the velocity in the flow (c+v) is smaller than the integration speed dx/dt;

or dx/dt larger than c+v.

I hope this physical interpretation from a Physicist helps.

  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Superlinear speedup in OpenFOAM 13 msrinath80 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 18 March 3, 2015 06:36
Physical significance of porous jump coefficient ulalala Main CFD Forum 0 September 16, 2010 02:45
physical significance of.... vijesh Main CFD Forum 7 August 13, 2007 03:18
Physical convergence criteria yogui FLUENT 0 April 27, 2005 08:34
Stream Function physical significance? ram Main CFD Forum 0 February 21, 2001 09:45

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:53.