|July 30, 2014, 15:02||
Mesh Refinement Study Problem
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1Rep Power: 0
I am performing a mesh refinement study on the volute of a pump.
While increasing elements my measure begins to converge, then jumps at around 9 million elements. All solutions have converged to 1E-06 RMS residuals.
I have attached a plot of the mesh refinement for reference.
Has anyone ever seen anything like this before? and if so what are some possible solutions or insight to what is going on here?
Here is some other info
k-epsilon turbulence model
default tetrahedral mesh
10 inflation layers at walls .003 [in] smallest layer, w/ growth rate of 1.2
I have ran similar geometries with these settings and not had this problem in the past.
Thanks in advance.
|August 1, 2014, 10:52||
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 68Rep Power: 8
For each mesh refinement level, you may also want to monitor convergence of your metric (forces, integrate pressure over a particular surface, etc.) in addition to monitoring the residuals of the conservation equations. Also, are there any issues with cell quality? You mention use of tet cells and as well as a turbulence model, is there a proper boundary layer mesh near the solid walls?
|August 3, 2014, 13:02||
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 497Rep Power: 9
You could be experiencing hysteresis. If you are using local time stepping, the trajectory the solution takes will have yet another dependency on the grid and how it is laid out. So when the grid is refined it must be refined everywhere in a similar fashion. If the refinement occurs some here and some there then that my trigger the hysteresis. Or, global time stepping should be used. But, that can be slow.
|August 6, 2014, 07:22||
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 40Rep Power: 4
Can you share your measure with us? is it a force or a moment on the pump.
It's not uncommon for changes in flow features as you change the mesh quality, as you start to pick up extra flow features that you couldnt with a smaller mesh size.
I would think consider different mesh types and different mesh types also, as these may have a significant effect. If the pump blades are at all separated then this may explain how things are shifting around so much.
TotalSim CFD Engineer
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Problem in snap for wing||Zephiro88||OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others||0||July 30, 2014 12:14|
|Moving mesh||Niklas Wikstrom (Wikstrom)||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||122||June 15, 2014 06:20|
|fluent add additional zones for the mesh file||SSL||FLUENT||2||January 26, 2008 12:55|
|Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option?||Joe||CFX||2||March 26, 2007 18:10|
|How to control Minximum mesh space?||hung||FLUENT||7||April 18, 2005 09:38|