|
[Sponsors] |
October 24, 2014, 17:41 |
DesignBuilder CFD
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 16 |
Is there anyone who has more experience with DesignBuilder CFD?
http://www.designbuilder.co.uk/content/view/152/226/ This software package costs a whole lost less than many commercial codes, there should be a reason. I'm interested in hearing your comments. Thanks. |
|
October 31, 2014, 06:23 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Rechard
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 11 |
Yes, HitechCFD has a good experience with DesignBuilder CFD & CFD Simulations.
|
|
August 7, 2021, 18:39 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Paul
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 15
Rep Power: 8 |
Hello,
I have experience with DesignBuilder. The other software packages are more expensive because those work for several applications. The CFD of DB is mainly for HVAC and that's why the cost is lower. The main advantage in my point of view is to have the energy simulation in the same tool and export those boundary conditions to the CFD module. Also, it's not necessary to recreate the same geometry. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
STAR-Works : Mainstream CAD with CFD | CD adapco Group Marketing | Siemens | 0 | February 13, 2002 12:23 |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 21:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 04:49 |
Since Last June | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 3 | July 12, 1999 09:38 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |