|
[Sponsors] |
December 16, 2007, 14:34 |
Leap Frog Scheme
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi I just want to know if leap frog scheme without any artificial viscosity would fetch good results in solving Sod's Shock tube(euler equation) problem. I was getting NaN's in solution after a few time steps..
|
|
December 17, 2007, 10:19 |
Re: Leap Frog Scheme
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
For the Shock tube test you really need something that "captures" the shock. You will get oscillations near the shock and at the same time you will "smooth out" the profile of the shock using a simple method as the leap frog scheme. You need to use a method adapted for shocks.
|
|
December 18, 2007, 13:52 |
Re: Leap Frog Scheme
|
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you do not use a shock capturing scheme ( Gud, roe, ENO etc.), you would need artificial viscosity to remove the oscillations observed on the leading and trailing edge. If you do not remove them, they would contaminate the solution. If you use macormack or leapfrog or other FD schemes add either an artificial damping or use wavenumber filtering to remove the oscillations.
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
how to understand high resolution scheme and high order scheme | iilw1314 | Main CFD Forum | 7 | April 12, 2022 13:29 |
Implementation of QUICK scheme | Romuald Skoda | Main CFD Forum | 11 | November 6, 2017 22:20 |
AUSM scheme ? Central Scheme | boling | Main CFD Forum | 7 | January 7, 2016 03:41 |
2nd order upwind scheme (Fluent and CFX) | Far | FLUENT | 0 | May 22, 2011 02:50 |
extrapolation in MUSCL scheme | Chandra | Main CFD Forum | 6 | February 14, 2007 12:21 |