|
[Sponsors] |
January 14, 2015, 00:58 |
Why do we need prism layers??
|
#1 |
New Member
Sam
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13 |
How do prism layers resolve the boundary layer flow phenomena? Can tri/hex resolve the same efficiently if mesh is fine at the boundaries?
|
|
January 15, 2015, 10:27 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Michael Prinkey
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pittsburgh PA
Posts: 363
Rep Power: 25 |
Hex refinement at boundaries is generally preferred to prisms (aka wedges), but often the surface mesh is triangular. The goal of boundary layer refinement is to resolved the flow details. Those details are (usually) present only in the wall normal direction. So, while it is (in principle) possible to tet a boundary layer, the cell counts will be enormous and the mesh skewness, especially in the cells close to the wall, will be crippling.
On the other hand, simply extruding the tri-surface mesh into the flow domain using prisms avoids all of those issues. The flow can be well resolved in the wall normal direction while keep cell count and skewness under control. |
|
January 15, 2015, 21:43 |
|
#3 |
New Member
Sam
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 9
Rep Power: 13 |
Thanks s lot ! It is useful information
|
|
February 11, 2015, 14:16 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
|
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Prism layers and grid dependence study | jcamilleri | STAR-CCM+ | 4 | July 7, 2014 13:47 |
[ICEM] Prism layers on duct | blazejpop | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | January 12, 2014 08:02 |
Trimmed Cell Mesher and Prism Layers | Jack220 | STAR-CCM+ | 4 | August 7, 2013 10:57 |
Getting prism to inflate into mixed tet-hex meshes | Joe | CFX | 16 | October 10, 2011 07:06 |
ICEM Prism Layer transition between surface with prism layers and one without | TWaung | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 2 | October 12, 2009 14:56 |