|February 21, 2008, 23:27||
Hi! Again a question on URF (using commercial code). I've searched past threads and found some q&a on URFs but still I feel there are uncertain answers. I want to ask again for advise (in case there are new updated findings):
1) I've run a model (one model) with 2 different URFs to reach convergence target of 0.001.
2) The result is slightly different by 7-10% although the volume mesh domain is exactly the same.
3) In case of default URF cannot reach convergence (in more complex geometry for example), how confident are we with the result when we changed the URF to lower values. I mean, is that result reliable when we can't compare with a default URF?
Should I increase back the URF in the second case back up to original URF somewhere along the way?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|URF and convergence in natural convergence||Marie-Anne||Main CFD Forum||11||September 11, 2009 10:07|
|URF for species||Claud||FLUENT||1||April 20, 2007 12:37|
|Help! Where is the URF for volume fraction?||gogo||FLUENT||0||January 23, 2006 16:08|
|URF - Pressure, Velocity||co2||FLUENT||0||May 11, 2004 21:36|
|Combustion convergence and URF||Mark||FLUENT||2||January 19, 2004 22:32|