
[Sponsors] 
February 15, 2015, 23:03 
SteadyState solution by timestepping?

#1 
New Member
John
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 2 
This might be a silly question, but I wrote a CFD code (compressible, unstructured mixed element in 2D and 3D) that I am having trouble converging in 3D for relatively low Mach numbers (~0.1).
I am aware that the NS and Euler equations become stiff at low Mach numbers. How are these cases typically dealt with? Are solutions to complex 3D problems typically time stepped to a steadystate solution? This will certainly make the linear system easier to solve, but seems rather inefficient. Is seems that straightup NewtonKrylov would be better. I'm using GMRES to solve the linear system and have put in a lot of work to get a good preconditioner, to the point that I don't think I can do any better on the preconditioning side of things. Any advice would be great! Last edited by mavguy; February 16, 2015 at 01:25. 

February 16, 2015, 08:14 

#2  
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,662
Rep Power: 23 
Quote:


February 16, 2015, 10:44 

#3 
New Member
John
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 18
Rep Power: 2 
Shouldn't steadystate be reachable without timestepping? In 2D, I use Newton's method and reach steadystate just fine. Is the initial guess for Newton typically just too far away from the solution in 3D for Newton to converge?


February 16, 2015, 12:09 

#4 
Senior Member
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,662
Rep Power: 23 
Again, you can directly solve the steadystate solution. Sometimes, there is not a numerical solution to the discrete system and that can be a signal that the flow is unsteady.
I suppose that for converging, the Newton method require you start from an initial guess not very far from the solution 

Tags 
steadystate convergence, timestepping 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Steady state solution as an initial condition for a transient problem  adnanakhtar  FLUENT  5  January 19, 2015 14:26 
How to write k and epsilon before the abnormal end  xiuying  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  8  August 27, 2013 15:33 
mixerVesselAMI2D's mass is not balancing  sharonyue  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  6  June 10, 2013 09:34 
same geometry,structured and unstructured mesh,different behaviour.  sharonyue  OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD  13  January 2, 2013 23:40 
AMI speed performance  danny123  OpenFOAM  19  October 24, 2012 07:44 