|
[Sponsors] |
June 16, 2008, 19:02 |
Solver dirtyness
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi,
I have asked for a colleague to work on my solver a bit and he said my solver had too much solver dirtyness and it was a mess and too long to find bugs. I have to carry on working on my cfd solver alone. How do you define solver dirtyness on a scale between 1 and 10? A programmer. |
|
June 20, 2008, 08:07 |
Re: Solver dirtyness
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Does your code: 1) have variable names that make sense? 2) have enough comments telling the programmer what it's doing? 3) have loops intended so it's easy to read and identify the flow of control?
If none of these can be answered with a "yes" then I can understand your colleague's frustration. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A New Solver for Supersonic Combustion | nakul | OpenFOAM Announcements from Other Sources | 19 | February 27, 2024 09:44 |
[Other] A New Solver for Supersonic Combustion | nakul | OpenFOAM Community Contributions | 20 | February 22, 2019 09:08 |
thobois class engineTopoChangerMesh error | Peter_600 | OpenFOAM | 4 | August 2, 2014 09:52 |
Development of a Low mach PISO solver | nishant_hull | OpenFOAM Programming & Development | 0 | August 25, 2009 12:48 |
why the solver reject it? Anyone with experience? | bearcat | CFX | 6 | April 28, 2008 14:08 |