|July 3, 2008, 15:36||
Cusp behind shock?
Hi Guys, I am studying steady, 2D transonic flow. I am concerned with subsonic freestream which have a Mach number above the critical Mach number (and therefore give rise to an embedded supersonic bubble on top of the airfoil).
I am reading that the foot of the shock is normal to the surface of the airfoil, I understand this to be necessary in order to ensure that the flow behind the shock is tangential to the airfoil surface. I have read, however, that the Rankine Hugoniot equations require that the shock has an infinite curvature at its foot. This is referred to as a Zierep cusp.
I am unsure what is meant by this statement. Could someone please explain to me what is meant by "infinite curvature"; I'd also be very happy if someone could explain why this cusp forms?
I have a working knowledge of the RH conditions but do not know why they would impose any condition upon the curvature of the shock.
Could someone please advise? Frank
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|HLL Riemann Shock Tube Matlab Problem||Luke F||Main CFD Forum||2||May 20, 2016 02:10|
|Shock Fitting||Craig||FLUENT||1||April 24, 2008 17:06|
|Will compression waves overtake a moving shock?||GRA||Main CFD Forum||2||October 19, 2006 00:24|
|Shock capturing||Dr B.M. Smith (Smith)||OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD||1||December 10, 2004 06:40|
|Normal shock waves||Fernando Velasco||Main CFD Forum||1||April 6, 2000 14:10|