CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

axisymmetrical flow

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   September 4, 2008, 15:35
Default axisymmetrical flow
  #1
sara
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Dear my friends

I want to validate my result in two dimentional laminar axisymmetrical flow.but my result show center velocity(umax) is 1.5 mean velocity(umax=1.5*umean).I read in fluid mechanic references in internal laminar flow in pipe that respect is 2 (umax=2*umean). could anyone tell me axisymmetrical flow's result is equal to intennal flow in pipe and what is correct result.

best regards sara
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2008, 16:32
Default Re: axisymmetrical flow
  #2
ag
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
For a laminar pipe (assuming no variation in the circumferential direction) the max velocity is twice the average velocity. This result can be found in a closed form solution (see for example Fluid Mechanics by White).
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2008, 00:41
Default Re: axisymmetrical flow
  #3
sara
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I want to know 2d axisymmetrical flow calculation's result is equal to 3d pipe flow result.help me many tanks
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2008, 08:46
Default Re: axisymmetrical flow
  #4
ag
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you are running a 2D axisymmetric laminar calculation, then the max velocity should be twice the mean. If you have fully 3D flow (with nonzero velocity components in all 3 directions) then the max velocity may not be twice the mean.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2008, 09:42
Default Re: axisymmetrical flow
  #5
sara
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
dear my friend thanks for your paid attention for my case.could you calculate max velocity twice the mean. i can't .i calculate 1.5.

regards
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2008, 15:02
Default Re: axisymmetrical flow
  #6
ag
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't understand what you are asking for here - the classic laminar result is that the max velocity is twice the mean, whether I compute it or not. I don't have your code, so I have no way of determining where your error is. I would suggest that you first make sure that the velocity profile has a parabolic shape. If your velocity profile is correct, then the error may be where you compute the average velocity.
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2008, 08:11
Default Re: axisymmetrical flow
  #7
sara
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
dear my friend

my result show umax/umean=1.5.for this reason i am not sure result . my velocity profile is parabolic .if is possible send me your email then i send velocity profile for you .

regards
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
mass flow in is not equal to mass flow out saii CFX 12 March 19, 2018 05:21
Flow meter Design CD adapco Group Marketing Siemens 3 June 21, 2011 08:33
What is the difference between liquid reactive flow and gas reactive flow? James Main CFD Forum 6 May 15, 2009 12:14
potential flow vs. Euler flow curious ... Main CFD Forum 23 July 21, 2006 07:40
Plug Flow Franck Main CFD Forum 3 September 4, 2003 05:57


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:55.