Any comment on SAMM?
I would appreciate any feedback from SAMM (Semi Automatic Meshing Methodology) users as far as how good is it in generating predominantly hexahedral mesh with minimum user interaction.
Thanks in advance. |
Re: Any comment on SAMM?
Just tell us what you want to do with SAMM !
It works very good for some applications and not so good for other ones. It s not a tool with a "solve-my-problem" button. |
Re: Any comment on SAMM?
I would say, with increasing complexity of your problems, you will see your chance to solve your problem with SAMM decreasing to nil!
|
Re: Any comment on SAMM?
The first year I had SAMM was a waste. There were just too many un-resolved cells to make it useful. However, over the last two years, Wayne has worked very hard to reduce the amount of semi in the Semi-Automatic-Meshing-Methodology. And it has become my mesher of choice.
If your CAD data is of high quality and your geometry does not change scale very much ( you don't have big things next to very small things - although local refinements should relax this problem) SAMM will work well. Everyone knows that there is NO magic Mesh button - Right??? |
Re: Any comment on SAMM?
I totally agree to Paul. Today, samm can be a very powerful tool for meshing, even for complex geometries. The problem is: one has to know how to use samm effectively.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:33. |