CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > Main CFD Forum

dissipation term in Navier-Stokes Equation

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro
  • 1 Post By FMDenaro

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 25, 2015, 01:07
Default dissipation term in Navier-Stokes Equation
  #1
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
The dissipation term in Navier-Stokes Equation is given by

div( T u_vector )

where T is viscous stress tensor and u_vector is velocity vector

T = n[ grad(u_vector) + transpose( grad(u_vector) ) ]
- (2*n/3) ( div(u_vector) I )

where n : viscosity , I : identity matrix

if we consider a 2 dimensional situation, how can I expand

div( T u_vector ) .

I know how to expand div( T ) , but I am facing problem while finding the expression for div( T u_vector ).

Is there any book or any link that explains this.

Please help.

Thanks in advance

- Mihir
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2015, 03:33
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,764
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
what you wrote is the mechanical work defined in the total energy equation...
if T =- p I + 2mu*grad v, you see a reversible work due to the isotropic term and an irreversible work due to the tangential stress.

The real energy dissipation term is the quadratic term in the kinetic energy equation mu * (grad v:grad v).

Said that, a way to develop the tensorial product is to use index notation

Div = ei d/dxi, T = ei tij ej, v = ei vi.

Alternatively, you can expand each term in the specific reference system you want to use. For example in a 2D Cartesian system:

Div = i d/dx + j d/dy, v = i u + j v

T = i tii i + j tjj j + i tij j + j tji i


and developing scalar products and derivatives by the definition.
You can see something "similar" to developing the divergence of a scalar function for a vector.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 03:15
Default
  #3
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
what you wrote is the mechanical work defined in the total energy equation...
if T =- p I + 2mu*grad v, you see a reversible work due to the isotropic term and an irreversible work due to the tangential stress.

The real energy dissipation term is the quadratic term in the kinetic energy equation mu * (grad v:grad v).

Said that, a way to develop the tensorial product is to use index notation

Div = ei d/dxi, T = ei tij ej, v = ei vi.

Alternatively, you can expand each term in the specific reference system you want to use. For example in a 2D Cartesian system:

Div = i d/dx + j d/dy, v = i u + j v

T = i tii i + j tjj j + i tij j + j tji i


and developing scalar products and derivatives by the definition.
You can see something "similar" to developing the divergence of a scalar function for a vector.
sir can I say that

div( T u_vector) = dot_product_of[ ( div T) and u_vector ] + double_contraction_of [ T and grad(u_vector) ]

Reply
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 04:15
Default
  #4
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
Is the equation in the image the correct answer

http://i.imgur.com/vCDKVQe.jpg



here u and v are the components of u_vector and T = viscous stress tensor


Reply.

Thanks in advance.

- Mihir
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 04:23
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,764
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
If I am right, using index notation for summation you get

d/dxi ( tau_ij uj)

you can check by expanding for 2D case
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 05:12
Default
  #6
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
If I am right, using index notation for summation you get

d/dxi ( tau_ij uj)

you can check by expanding for 2D case
if I expand d/dxi ( tau_ij uj) , then I do get the terms same as in the image...

Thankyou

- Mihir
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 05:40
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,764
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
good!

remember, this term is not the mechanical energy dissipation but is more general
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 06:24
Default
  #8
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
ok.

- Mihir
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 07:41
Default
  #9
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
after expanding d/dxi ( tau_ij uj) and substituting the equation for Tij , I get certain terms ( consider equations ( 1- 4) )

I am trying to discretize the equations ( 1 - 4 ) using Finite volume method on a 2D cartesian Control volume of sides delta_x and delta_y . I am using staggered grid

1)

u\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(\mu\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)

2)

u\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(\mu\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}\right)

3)

\mu\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\right)

4)

\mu\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)\left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}\right)

here u and v are velocity components and mu is viscosity

equations 1 and 2 are nonlinear whereas equations 3 and 4 are product of partial derivatives.

How can I discretize them. is there a book that explain this

- Mihir
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 07:58
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,764
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
No, in a FV manner You have to discretize directly the divergence form !
anon_h likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 08:38
Default
  #11
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
No, in a FV manner You have to discretize directly the divergence form !
sir do you mean that , first I multiply Tau with u to get a matrix form, then take divergence of the matrix and then discretize it.
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 08:53
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,764
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by mihirmakwana6 View Post
sir do you mean that , first I multiply Tau with u to get a matrix form, then take divergence of the matrix and then discretize it.

yes, you can store an auxiliar vector f = T.v and take its divergence in each computational cell
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 08:59
Default
  #13
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
yes, you can store an auxiliar vector f = T.v and take its divergence in each computational cell
sir just to be sure..

in the term f = T.v

, the . is a dot product between T and v , right ??
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 09:00
Default
  #14
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,764
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by mihirmakwana6 View Post
sir just to be sure..

in the term f = T.v

, the . is a dot product between T and v , right ??

correct
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 10:15
Default
  #15
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
sir, I have written the equation in the divergence form

http://i.imgur.com/hKAdhth.jpg?1

Is this correct????

So, now terms A and B are terms to be calculated at the cell faces ,right ?
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 12:11
Default
  #16
Senior Member
 
Filippo Maria Denaro
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 6,764
Rep Power: 71
FMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura aboutFMDenaro has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by mihirmakwana6 View Post
sir, I have written the equation in the divergence form

http://i.imgur.com/hKAdhth.jpg?1

Is this correct????

So, now terms A and B are terms to be calculated at the cell faces ,right ?

that's right
anon_h likes this.
FMDenaro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2015, 12:41
Default
  #17
Member
 
Mihir Makwana
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 79
Rep Power: 10
mihirmakwana6 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by FMDenaro View Post
that's right
ok. thankyou sir.

- Mihir
mihirmakwana6 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
second derivatives in the navier stokes equation catapult OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 March 27, 2014 09:32
What is really SGS dissipation term in LES? mrf6166 Main CFD Forum 0 January 5, 2014 06:57
Conservative form of Navier Stokes equation. balkrishna OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 January 25, 2012 08:33
Navier stokes compresible viscid flow fea, somebody can help? Jose Choy Main CFD Forum 3 October 24, 2003 02:28
help: I am trying to solve Navier Stokes compressible and viscid flow Jose Choy Main CFD Forum 2 May 18, 2000 05:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:53.