CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Main CFD Forum

Mesh size

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 17, 2008, 11:40
Default Mesh size
  #1
Ramesh.K
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

can any body tell me the criteria to determine the mesh size and time step size in hand before solving the problem

is there any estimate where in we can say that we can go till this paritcular size for mesh and time step.

how are these dependent upon the initial and boundary conditions.

we know that high frequiencies are always solved on fine mesh sizes and so we determine once we know the highest frequency in the problem.

thanks in advance

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 17, 2008, 14:02
Default Re: Mesh size
  #2
mettler
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I always did a grid check. I got a solution that I was happy with, and then I would increase the mesh count and see if the answer was the same or at least within some %, and then I would also decrease the mesh size and check the answer again. If the answered changed substantially when I increased the mesh size I knew something was wrong and would increase the mesh count again and see how that answer compared. You can visually show this in a graph of mesh count v's answer..you will flat line after you find the least amount of cells
  Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2008, 00:40
Default Re: Mesh size
  #3
Ramesh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi

Thanks for the reply

but thats a crude way of setting the size.

in first hand can we try to predict by knowing the frequency range ofthe problem under cosideration.

  Reply With Quote

Old   September 18, 2008, 05:58
Default Re: Mesh size
  #4
Anton Lyaskin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If you're running a non-steady simulation (i.e. real transient or pseudo-transient), than your mesh size and time step are linked together via Courant number. Though there are strict restrictions only explicit schemes, which are not so widely used, even for implicit scheme putting a Courant number above 500...1000 will make no good.

Another limitation comes from y+ if you do a turbulent simulation (and if it's not DNS). This can give you the size of near-wall cells. And you can actually derive the size of all other cells from mesh quality considerations like aspect ratio limit and also the fact that most differencing schemes doesn't perform well if two adjacent cells differ in size more than 1.2...1.5 times.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SnappyHexMesh for internal Flow vishwa OpenFOAM 22 July 14, 2014 19:30
Mesh motion with Translation & Rotation Doginal CFX 2 January 12, 2014 06:21
Gambit Unstructed (Tet) Mesh - size control newbie FLUENT 3 August 26, 2008 11:38
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10
How to decide the mesh size? echo CD-adapco 1 May 23, 2006 05:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:28.