SPH vs FVM -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

September 6, 2015, 10:15	SPH vs FVM	#1
Michail Member Michail Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Lithuania Posts: 41 Rep Power: 17	Hello dear colleagues My way had born the question Does have sense to solve TECFLAM-burner case in Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) solver instead of some FVM solver, like OpenFOAM or Fluent? the TECFLAM case is here http://qnet-ercoftac.cfms.org.uk/w/index.php/AC_2-06 Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) and its solvers is here https://wiki.manchester.ac.uk/spheri....php/Main_Page I start to work with SPH because it has more prospectives and it has more "white spots" comparing with FVM solvers. So I guess, what chances has SPH method applied to usual field of FVM solvers?

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Practical difference between FVM and LBM?	pharg_yrartibra	Main CFD Forum	2	November 25, 2013 10:52
FVM in 1-D spherical coordinates	lost.identity	Main CFD Forum	0	January 17, 2011 09:06
SPHysics or other free SPH codes	Henrike	OpenFOAM	2	June 8, 2010 03:31
comments on FDM, FEM, FVM, SM, SEM, DSEM, BEM	kenn	Main CFD Forum	2	July 18, 2004 18:28
References for FVM	Anthony Wachs	Main CFD Forum	8	February 20, 2002 19:23

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:02.