# Incompressible vs compressible solvers

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 18, 2009, 14:32 Incompressible vs compressible solvers #1 James Guest   Posts: n/a Hi, I have to model an internal flow situation where the Mach number varies from 0.03 to 1.2. I have a compressible flow solver at hand. I'm wondering whether a compressible solver can solve the flow even if I have very low Mach numbers? I was told that I could re-scale my geometry so that I can have a higher Mach number and the re-scaling would a lower Re. Cheers

 January 18, 2009, 17:00 Re: Incompressible vs compressible solvers #2 otd Guest   Posts: n/a Not sure I understand: If you change the geometry in the compressible solver (CS) in such a way that you change the velocity field, that would change the Mach number field. The Reynolds number has velocity and a geometry dimension in it - so Re might go up or down depending on what was changed in what direction. It might be more useful to set up the same geometry in both compressible and incompressible codes - if both codes are well-understood and checked out. Some of the older Los Alamos codes (sola-ice comes to mind) would work at low Mach numbers. Hope this is of some use to you.

 January 18, 2009, 20:39 Re: Incompressible vs compressible solvers #3 Harish Guest   Posts: n/a The compressible flow solver would work fine at the lower mach number range if you have preconditioning implemented in the compressible solver. You rescale the wave speeds to achieve this.

 January 19, 2009, 00:32 Re: Incompressible vs compressible solvers #4 momentum_waves Guest   Posts: n/a What about viscous stresses? If the solver is based on Euler equations & not Navier-Stokes, you're going to be solving for the wrong physics. Surely? mw... www.adthermtech.com/wordpress3

 January 19, 2009, 06:07 Re: Incompressible vs compressible solvers #5 James Guest   Posts: n/a Sorry I meant rescaling the geometry and using a higher Mach numbers so that the Reynolds number still remains constant (if that makes sense). Will this be valid?

 January 19, 2009, 06:15 Re: Incompressible vs compressible solvers #6 Timon Guest   Posts: n/a No. For flows to be dynamically equivalent, both Reynolds and Mach number need to be the same!

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post chinababu FLUENT 4 November 13, 2008 06:56 jinwon park Main CFD Forum 17 December 13, 2007 06:00 Jinwon Main CFD Forum 6 November 23, 2007 22:07 ag Main CFD Forum 2 September 27, 2005 06:18 Fernando Velasco Hurtado Main CFD Forum 3 January 7, 2000 17:51

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31.