|
[Sponsors] |
March 10, 2016, 12:53 |
reynolds number for moving mesh
|
#1 |
Member
Shah
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 12 |
hi everyone
can someone tell me, as to how to estimate the Re Number of a moving mesh problem. Since the Re number will determine whether the flow is laminar or turbulent, and therefore, whether to apply laminar NS equations or turbulent models etc, but the question is how to find it ? I dont think it should be based on the free stream velocity because the air next to the moving body should be moving faster than that ! pls help |
|
March 10, 2016, 14:17 |
|
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 351
Rep Power: 18 |
What is the fluid velocity? As far as the Re number is concerned that is the velocity you want. As an example, consider flow over an airfoil. The airfoil is fixed and the fluid velocity is the speed of the fluid relative to the airfoil surface. Via a Galilean transformation the problem can also be solved by moving the airfoil through quiescent air. The fluid velocity used in the Re number calculation would still be the velocity of the fluid relative to the airfoil surface. Regardless of whether you use a moving mesh, there should be some physical velocity in your problem.
|
|
March 10, 2016, 14:25 |
|
#3 |
Member
Shah
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 12 |
Thank you agd for ur reply.
The flow field i am studying has a 1m/s inlet velocity, while the airfoil is oscillating at say 1 cps frequency. |
|
March 10, 2016, 16:18 |
|
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 351
Rep Power: 18 |
So how would you compute the fluid velocity seen by an observer fixed to the airfoil?
|
|
March 10, 2016, 21:25 |
|
#5 |
Member
Shah
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 12 |
Well, it is changing continuously. Since it is moving sinusoidally, the velocity is a function of time. This is what confuses me. How to compute the reynolds number.
|
|
March 11, 2016, 10:35 |
|
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 351
Rep Power: 18 |
When you talk about the Re number remember that there is not a single Re number for a problem. If you are looking for a figure of merit to compare to other problems, you could use the mean velocity of the flow, or you could use the approach velocity (in this case the inlet velocity). Either of these would be reasonable values for computation of a y+ for grid generation. For comparison to experiment I would defer to how the quantity is defined in the experiment.
|
|
March 11, 2016, 18:49 |
|
#7 |
Member
Shah
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 12 |
Thank you for reply agd.
I figure one may make any velocity as reference and then go on refining until mesh independence is achieved. M i right? |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Foam::error::PrintStack | almir | OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD | 91 | December 21, 2022 04:50 |
[snappyHexMesh] No layers in a small gap | bobburnquist | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 6 | August 26, 2015 09:38 |
[blockMesh] --> foam fatal error: | lillo763 | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 0 | March 5, 2014 10:27 |
DecomposePar unequal number of shared faces | maka | OpenFOAM Pre-Processing | 6 | August 12, 2010 09:01 |
[Commercial meshers] Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues | michele | OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion | 2 | July 15, 2005 04:15 |