# Practical hydrodynamics

 User Name Remember Me Password
 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 January 19, 2000, 00:38 Practical hydrodynamics #1 Brad Guest   Posts: n/a Ten years ago I designed and built a 19ft wooden skiff. I spend many days and nights off the California coast persuing my hobby of underwater photography. The hull has a flatbottom and 3 stringers running the length of the hull separated by two 7" channels. Each stringer is 1" thick and has a full radius on each edge. The 'good skiff' travels at less than 30 mph. My question is this: Would it lessen the drag on the hull if the stringers were beveled as opposed to having a full radius? Would the degree of bevel make a difference? I was thinking that if they were beveled, it would pack water into the two channels, adding lift to the hull but I have no way of determining this. My hull is too precious to make a mistake with. Any feedback that you offer will be greately appreciated. Sincerely, Brad

 January 19, 2000, 17:49 Re: Practical hydrodynamics #2 Alton J. Reich, P.E. Guest   Posts: n/a My gut (which shows you just how scientific an answer you get, even here) tells me to advise you not to do anything to what you've described as a good boat (built with your own hands, which I applaud). Here's what I think: 1. Beveling the stringers would probably reduce the drag. 2. The degree of reduction would depend on how you shape it. 3. The total amount of drag caused by the stringers in the present configuration is small compared to the drag on the overall hull, based on my understanding of your description. The hull is a few feet wide by 19 feet long, that's a lot of surface are compared to the 3 stringers. I'm thinking that the stringers represent 10% of the drag, at most (probably less). Based on that, eliminating them completely would get you 2 or 3 knots, tops. From a risk / reward standpoint, it's not worth it to risk screwing up a perfectly good hull for a couple of knots (unless you're competing for the Americas Cup, and I'm sure you've seen some of those boats fold up like a paper bag). As you pointed out, your hull is too precious to make a mistake with, and it works fine as is. Alton

 January 20, 2000, 00:24 Re: Practical hydrodynamics #4 John C. Chien Guest   Posts: n/a (1). I don't have any idea about the shape of your love boat, so it is hard to give any suggestion. (2). But I used to optimize the shape of centrifugal fan by using "paper clay". The paper clay can be shaped, sand after it is completely dried overnight. By gradually change the shape, removing and adding paper clay, and through testing, I could arrive at the optimum shape, which is quite sensitive to the drag. (3). I think, you can first do some research to find out the right type of clay, oil-based maybe, stay flexible type, non-permanent, so you can easily remove it if you need to do so. (4). By trial-and error, I think, you should be able to arrive at the optimum shape. Testing is necessary, because the accurate prediction of the drag, though not impossible, is rather difficult without a high power computer. Since you have already developed some kind of intuition about the boat design, this hands-on approach would be ideal. (5). For larger area, you can also cover it with high density styloform porous material first, the with the clay over and around it. So, check out your local arts supply store, model store, or wind tunnel testing store for the right type of material. It is possible that there is already an ideal type for boat application. Remember that, sometimes, small changes in the shape can have large impact on the drag. (6). The other possibility is to build a quarter scale model and test it there. It is likely that somewhere along the line, you will discover something new. Or you can always tell a story about how you increase the drag of your love boat.

 January 21, 2000, 09:16 Thank you Mr Chien #5 Brad Guest   Posts: n/a Experimenting is good advice, but it would be difficullt to actually do as I would have to apply over 60 feet of it on an upside down surface. I wish I could! I have decided to bevel the edges when I buy a new motor in the coming months. From what you and Mr Reich have said, it sounds like the chances for improved performance are good enough to make the effory. Thank you for your thoughtful reply! Sincerely, Brad

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Costa Main CFD Forum 2 May 19, 2012 21:41 Adnan FLUENT 1 February 13, 2010 22:23 ettax CD-adapco 1 January 27, 2009 11:44 Gavin Butcher CFX 0 September 19, 2000 05:20 Denis V. Voskov Main CFD Forum 0 October 31, 1998 18:36

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30.

 Contact Us - CFD Online - Top