|
[Sponsors] |
June 19, 2016, 19:47 |
vortex shedding
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 9 |
Hello,i am new in CFD and i want to simulate a von karman vortex shedding over a cylinder in 2d.I do not understand why it was said to use a pressure based solver and not a density based one. I am working with a Re=100.
If someone can help me understand the reason behind this choice i would really appreciate it . |
|
June 19, 2016, 23:20 |
|
#2 | |
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The pressure-based approach was developed for low-speed incompressible flows, while the density-based approach was mainly used for high-speed compressible flows. In the pressure-based approach, the pressure field is extracted by solving a pressure or pressure correction equation which is obtained by manipulating continuity and momentum equations In the density-based approach, the continuity equation is used to obtain the density field while the pressure field is determined from the equation of state, i.e you should add equations that relate pressure to density and temperature, which are,in turn, extracted from isoentropic conditions etc. Besides adding complexity in the case of incompressible liquid, this only works well for close to ideal gases, not dense liquids. |
||
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
K-Epsilon for Vortex Shedding | Sham | FLUENT | 33 | March 29, 2017 05:48 |
Cylinder vortex shedding (3D) | Apocolapse | STAR-CCM+ | 2 | April 3, 2014 20:33 |
Transiet Animation - vortex shedding | derz | CFX | 5 | May 10, 2010 09:21 |
Vortex shedding behind cylider in cross flow | Muthu | FLUENT | 0 | March 6, 2006 10:29 |
basic vortex shedding | john | Main CFD Forum | 4 | November 6, 2000 13:23 |